2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06014-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time quaking-induced conversion assay is accurate for Lewy body diseases: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.93) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), respectively, to distinguish synucleinopathies from nonsynucleinopathies. There is one previous meta-analysis 58 assessing the performance of RT-QuIC in the diagnosis of LBDs reporting a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.91 and 0.95, respectively, which is similar to the results of our analysis. Extending the previous meta-analysis, 58 we have also included studies using PMCA methodology and our study also differs in further methodological aspects: (1) MSA patients were included in the patient group in our main analysis, as α-synuclein aggregates in the form of oligodendroglial cytoplasmic inclusions represent the histopathological hallmark of the disease 1 ; (2) Non-manifesting carriers of genetic mutations associated with synuclein pathology known to cause PD and patients with MCI-LB were also included as they represent prodromal disease stages, in which diagnostic utility of αSyn-SAAs may be of particular relevance for future clinical trials and clinical practice; (3) For the main analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of αSyn-SAAs in the differential diagnosis of synucleinopathies versus nonsynucleinopathies, we included four more studies 34,36,51,56 using RT-QuIC, and three more studies 13,29,38 using PMCA, while we excluded one study 9 of the former meta-analysis because subjects were from the same longitudinal cohort reported in another study 24 ; (4) We performed several subgroup-analyses focusing on different patient cohorts to generate more profound data on the diagnostic utility of RT-QuIC and PMCA in specific clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, our meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.93) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), respectively, to distinguish synucleinopathies from nonsynucleinopathies. There is one previous meta-analysis 58 assessing the performance of RT-QuIC in the diagnosis of LBDs reporting a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.91 and 0.95, respectively, which is similar to the results of our analysis. Extending the previous meta-analysis, 58 we have also included studies using PMCA methodology and our study also differs in further methodological aspects: (1) MSA patients were included in the patient group in our main analysis, as α-synuclein aggregates in the form of oligodendroglial cytoplasmic inclusions represent the histopathological hallmark of the disease 1 ; (2) Non-manifesting carriers of genetic mutations associated with synuclein pathology known to cause PD and patients with MCI-LB were also included as they represent prodromal disease stages, in which diagnostic utility of αSyn-SAAs may be of particular relevance for future clinical trials and clinical practice; (3) For the main analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of αSyn-SAAs in the differential diagnosis of synucleinopathies versus nonsynucleinopathies, we included four more studies 34,36,51,56 using RT-QuIC, and three more studies 13,29,38 using PMCA, while we excluded one study 9 of the former meta-analysis because subjects were from the same longitudinal cohort reported in another study 24 ; (4) We performed several subgroup-analyses focusing on different patient cohorts to generate more profound data on the diagnostic utility of RT-QuIC and PMCA in specific clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results of the present and of the previous meta-analysis 58 demonstrate that αSyn-SAAs represent a highly sensitive method for the diagnosis of synucleinopathies and support their usefulness as a diagnostic biomarker in clinical routine work-up. The pooled specificity for differentiating synucleinopathies with LBs from PSP/CBD was high as well with 0.94 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98), although sample sizes for PSP/CBD were rather small in most of the included studies.…”
Section: Reviewsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Real-time shock-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) and protein misfolding cyclic amplification are both SAA ( Shahnawaz et al, 2020 ; Orrù et al, 2021 ; Mammana et al, 2024 ). A meta-analysis demonstrated its ability to accurately and reliably diagnose Lewy body diseases such as PD ( Wang et al, 2022 ). Studies have shown that α-synuclein-specific analyses performed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can differentiate patients with PD from healthy controls with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity ( Siderowf et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied to α-synucleinopathies, an abnormal protein would induce the conversion and aggregation of recombinant α-syn that acts as a substrate (please see Figure 1 for a schematic representation). RT-QuIC has sparked great attention during the last years, leading to the publication of several reviews (Kurapova et al, 2022;Srivastava et al, 2022;Y. Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%