1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02047042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time measurement and interpretation of the conductivity and pH of precipitation samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conductivity of saturated HgCl2 in water (at 0.1% vol/vol) was 13.6 ± 0.4 uS/cm, which is also comparable to our field blanks and less than what was observed for our samples. Even with this background correction applied, the conductivity values presented here are expected to be similar to or higher than what would typically be found in rainwater (4 to 150 µS/cm; Beverland et al, 1997) as the rain sensor deliberately selects for precipitation containing ionic chemical components with conductivity greater than 1.0 uS/cm, while excluding pure water during atmospheric washout, which would dilute the dissolved solutes in the wet deposition sample and lower the resulting conductivity values. The overall comparability between our range and those previously reported, where the lower limit is slightly higher in our dataset, demonstrates that the principle of operation of our instrument is robust.…”
Section: Precipitation Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The conductivity of saturated HgCl2 in water (at 0.1% vol/vol) was 13.6 ± 0.4 uS/cm, which is also comparable to our field blanks and less than what was observed for our samples. Even with this background correction applied, the conductivity values presented here are expected to be similar to or higher than what would typically be found in rainwater (4 to 150 µS/cm; Beverland et al, 1997) as the rain sensor deliberately selects for precipitation containing ionic chemical components with conductivity greater than 1.0 uS/cm, while excluding pure water during atmospheric washout, which would dilute the dissolved solutes in the wet deposition sample and lower the resulting conductivity values. The overall comparability between our range and those previously reported, where the lower limit is slightly higher in our dataset, demonstrates that the principle of operation of our instrument is robust.…”
Section: Precipitation Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Acidic gases (NO x and SO x ) are emitted into the air by various sources. They combine with water in the air to form sulphurous and nitrous acids which then fall as rain to contaminate water in rivers and lakes by decreasing the pH [10,11]. The acidic water leaches metals out of the rocks and sediments as soluble ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major soluble component of the atmosphere is CO 2 but this is only weakly ionized in solution and the carbonic acid (H 2 CO 3 ) generated defines a lower limit for background pH of 5.6 at 15 o C (Beverland et al, 1997 and references therein). As Beverland et al (1997) show, although a pH increase of 0.061, due to decreasing Henry's Law constant, can be expected between 5 and 25 o C for carbonic acid alone, changes of CO 2 equilibrium cannot be responsible for the observed discrepancies of rain samples collected within the pH range 3.9 to 4.9. The major species which contribute to an increased acidification of rainwater are SO 2 and sulphuric (H 2 SO 4 ), nitric (HNO 3 ) and hydrochloric (HCl) acids.…”
Section: Methods For Sampling Wet Depositionmentioning
confidence: 72%