1997
DOI: 10.1193/1.1585982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Loss Estimation as an Emergency Response Decision Support System: The Early Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment Tool (EPEDAT)

Abstract: At the time of the Northridge earthquake, a number of new technologies, including real-time availability of earthquake source data, improved loss estimation techniques, Geographic Information Systems and various satellite-based monitoring systems, were either available or under consideration as emergency management resources. The potential benefits from these technologies for earthquake hazard mitigation, response and recovery, however, were largely conceptual. One of the major lessons learned from the January… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Macroseismic intensity (Grünthal, 2011) is a useful tool for purposes such as loss estimation (e.g., Eguchi et al, 1997;Grünthal et al, 2006;Wyss, 2008), communication of earthquake effects to the public (e.g., Wald, Quitoriano, Heaton, et al, 1999), and SHAs in regions with abundant historical earthquake records and moderate seismicity but sparse seismometer coverage (e.g., Musson, 2000;Bindi et al, 2011). Because the evaluation of building vulnerability is part of both macroseismic investigation and risk assessment, it is a natural advantage for intensity as the basis of risk assessment, leading to the continual popularity of the use of intensity for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroseismic intensity (Grünthal, 2011) is a useful tool for purposes such as loss estimation (e.g., Eguchi et al, 1997;Grünthal et al, 2006;Wyss, 2008), communication of earthquake effects to the public (e.g., Wald, Quitoriano, Heaton, et al, 1999), and SHAs in regions with abundant historical earthquake records and moderate seismicity but sparse seismometer coverage (e.g., Musson, 2000;Bindi et al, 2011). Because the evaluation of building vulnerability is part of both macroseismic investigation and risk assessment, it is a natural advantage for intensity as the basis of risk assessment, leading to the continual popularity of the use of intensity for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. And many methodologies (as EGUCHI et al, 1997;FEMA, 2003) have been developed for estimating the economic impact of earthquakes. However, despite advances in methodologies and developments in seismic code, limited resources and increasing costs often restrict their application in extensive rural areas, and results in greater uncertainty of expected losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earthquake event timetable is a determining factor for the estimation of the victims, as it affects the number of people present inside the buildings at the time of collapse [16].…”
Section: Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%