Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2006 2006
DOI: 10.5244/c.20.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Time Illumination Invariant Background Subtraction Using Local Kernel Histograms

Abstract: Constant background hypothesis for background subtraction algorithms is often not applicable in real environments because of shadows, reflections, or small moving objects in the background: flickering screens in indoor scenes, or waving vegetation in outdoor ones. In both indoor and outdoor scenes, the use of color cues for background segmentation is limited by illumination variations when lights are switched or weather changes. This problem can be partially allievated using robust color coordinates or backgro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this scene falls outside the scope of the considered algorithm which is targeted for outdoor traffic scenes. If the LightSwitch sequence is excluded this gives on average 6.78% misclassified pixels, which is slightly better than the results presented in [15], [12], 7.82% and 7.33% misclassified pixels respectively. The proposed algorithm is also significantly faster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this scene falls outside the scope of the considered algorithm which is targeted for outdoor traffic scenes. If the LightSwitch sequence is excluded this gives on average 6.78% misclassified pixels, which is slightly better than the results presented in [15], [12], 7.82% and 7.33% misclassified pixels respectively. The proposed algorithm is also significantly faster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The proposed algorithm were also tested on the WallFlower dataset from [15] available online 1 , which is also used by [12]. This dataset consists of 7 sequences with resolution 160x120.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, gradient in-formation used for pixel-based background subtraction is highly unreliable under camera motion (shaking). Even more advanced features like histograms of gradients [10], which are supposed to be robust against small camera movements, appeared to be very sensitive to vibrations of the camera in our experiments using i-LIDS parking vehicle sequences [6]. Seki et al [12] model the co-occurrence of variations between adjacent blocks, thereby achieving accurate segmentation under illumination variation and swaying vegetation, but this proposal seems compute intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], pixel value probability densities, represented as normalized histograms, are accumulated over time, and BG label are assigned by the Maximum A Posteriori criterion. Region-based algorithms usually divide the frames into blocks and calculate block-specific features; change detection is then achieved via block matching, considering for example fusion of edge and intensity information [7]. In [8] a region model describing local texture characteristic is presented:the method is prone to errors when shadows and sudden global changes of illumination occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%