2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Elastography in the Diagnosis of Patients Suspected of Having Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deeks’ funnel plots showed no significant publication bias, and according to the QUADAS-2 questionnaire, the 7 studies were of high quality. Our results showed that SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 84.4% and specificity of 86.0% for the detection of PCa; these values are both higher than those obtained for traditional TRUS 32 and real-time elastography for the diagnosis of patients with suspected PCa 37 . The AUC (0.91) and DOR (33.069) further indicated perfect overall accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Deeks’ funnel plots showed no significant publication bias, and according to the QUADAS-2 questionnaire, the 7 studies were of high quality. Our results showed that SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 84.4% and specificity of 86.0% for the detection of PCa; these values are both higher than those obtained for traditional TRUS 32 and real-time elastography for the diagnosis of patients with suspected PCa 37 . The AUC (0.91) and DOR (33.069) further indicated perfect overall accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Zhang et al performed a meta-analysis including SE data from 7 studies (508 patients) compared to histopathology following radical prostatectomy, showing a pooled sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 76% for prostate cancer detection (Table 3, 125). In another study by Brock et al in 229 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer using grey-scale ultrasonography and SE, the sensitivity and specificity of SE in detecting prostate cancer was 51% and 72% respectively, compared to 18% and 90% respectively for conventional grey-scale ultrasonography.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Ultrasound Elastographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a metaanalysis by Aboumarzouk et al (35), the sensitivity and specificity of SE were in the range of 71%-82% and 60%-95%, respectively, with radical prostatectomy specimens as the reference standard. A more recent metaanalysis by Zhang et al (36) comparing SE with radical prostatectomy specimens reported a pooled sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 76%. Benign conditions such as prostatitis, fibrosis, and atrophy may demonstrate decreased elasticity, resulting in false-positive results.…”
Section: Ultrasound Elastographymentioning
confidence: 99%