2022
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-22-1419-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time coastal flood hazard assessment using DEM-based hydrogeomorphic classifiers

Abstract: Abstract. In the last decade, DEM-based classifiers based on height above nearest drainage (HAND) have been widely used for rapid flood hazard assessment, demonstrating satisfactory performance for inland floods. The main limitation is the high sensitivity of HAND to the topography, which degrades the accuracy of these methods in flat coastal regions. In addition, these methods are mostly used for a given return period and generate static hazard maps for past flood events. To cope with these two limitations, h… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the current research, only flood extent was considered in the exposure analysis though both flood depth and extent were provided as outputs from the eBTM. This consideration is consistent with several studies recently carried out in the field of flood management (Dandapat & Panda 2018, Hadipour et al 2020, Jafarzadegan et al 2022, Stephens et al 2017. In this study, the omission of flood depth was based on two main factors: the unreliability of the flood depth outputs, which were not validated, and the resolution of the DEM used in the analysis, potentially affecting flood depth accuracy.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the case of the current research, only flood extent was considered in the exposure analysis though both flood depth and extent were provided as outputs from the eBTM. This consideration is consistent with several studies recently carried out in the field of flood management (Dandapat & Panda 2018, Hadipour et al 2020, Jafarzadegan et al 2022, Stephens et al 2017. In this study, the omission of flood depth was based on two main factors: the unreliability of the flood depth outputs, which were not validated, and the resolution of the DEM used in the analysis, potentially affecting flood depth accuracy.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In fact, Bass and Bedient (2018) have already developed such a surrogate modeling approach to create a FIM within our study area that loosely couples inland and coastal models, forcing both with a full range of potential tropical-cyclone characteristics. Recently, Jafarzadegan et al (2022) demonstrated a new methodology for replicating high-fidelity hydrodynamic model output by using a revised version of the HAND methodology that accounts for the height above and distance to the nearest drainage feature and is computationally efficient enough for FIM construction during flood events. This revised HAND methodology could function as a form of surrogate modeling for timely FIM creation.…”
Section: How To Improve Fim Creation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, steady-state hydraulic models, such as HAND and AutoRoute, tend to have limited effectiveness in providing FIMs during compound coastal floods in coastal watersheds. However, nonoperational alternative HAND approaches for coastal flooding in low-lying areas exist (Jafarzadegan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For coastal flood hazard assessment, hydrodynamic models should be calibrated and validated against observed water level at river gauges. For example, Jafarzadegan et al (2022) proposed using a digital elevation model based approach for the rapid real-time assessment of flood hazard in coastal areas. A two-dimensional hydrodynamic model is first calibrated based on observed water levels at USGS gauges and then the calibrated model is used to generate a flood inundation map for further analysis.…”
Section: Outlook For An Early-warning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%