2000
DOI: 10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0222:rtaord>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Adjustment of Range-Dependent Biases in WSR-88D Rainfall Estimates due to Nonuniform Vertical Profile of Reflectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We up to 230 km in range from a radar. While some studies discuss the quality of conventional radar rain estimates at large distances (e.g., Smith et al 1996;Seo et al 2000), the performance of polarimetric methods at distances greater than 100 km has not been well investigated. With few exceptions, the majority of the dual-polarization S-band radar-gauge comparisons have been made for warm-season precipitation and at distances of less than 100 km.…”
Section: Point Arealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We up to 230 km in range from a radar. While some studies discuss the quality of conventional radar rain estimates at large distances (e.g., Smith et al 1996;Seo et al 2000), the performance of polarimetric methods at distances greater than 100 km has not been well investigated. With few exceptions, the majority of the dual-polarization S-band radar-gauge comparisons have been made for warm-season precipitation and at distances of less than 100 km.…”
Section: Point Arealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies discuss the quality of conventional rainfall estimation with single-polarization radar to large distances (e.g., Fabry et al 1992;Smith et al 1996;Seo et al 2000;Krajewski and Ciach 2005). To obtain accurate surface rainfall measurements at longer distances, it is necessary to address the impact of meltinglayer and frozen-hydrometeor contamination on radar measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers should be interpreted in a qualitative sense rather than as a new benchmark. There are several other studies documented in the literature that have evaluated various aspects of the current technology performance (e.g., Smith et al 1996;Baeck and Smith 1998;Young et al 1999;Brandes et al 1999;Westrick et al 1999;Seo et al 2000;Ciach et al 2007) and cumulatively provided a much more comprehensive assessment. Efforts continue to improve operational quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) products (e.g., Vasiloff et al 2007), likely resulting in better results than those indicated by our simple analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%