2018
DOI: 10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.5727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readquisición de la tolerancia asociativa al etanol: el efecto de la extinción masiva

Abstract: El consumo repetido de ciertas drogas produce tolerancia, es decir, la disminución de sus efectos y la necesidad de obtener, por lo tanto, mayores dosis. Desde el paradigma del condicionamiento pavloviano, en la presente investigación dos experimentos examinaron el impacto del uso de cantidad masiva de ensayos de extinción en la readquisición de la tolerancia al etanol. En el experimento 1 se evaluó la adquisición, extinción y readquisición de la tolerancia al etanol en ratas tras 9 ensayos de extinción. En el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using many extinction trials and multiple contexts of extinction in Pavlovian learning have shown to reduce the recovery of extinguished responses (e.g., Denniston, Chang, & Miller, 2003; González et al, 2016; Gunther, Denniston, & Miller, 1998; Laborda & Miller, 2013; San Martín, Díaz, Cañete, Laborda, & Miguez, 2018). For instance, Experiment 2 in González et al (2016) evaluated whether using massive extinction (12 vs. 60 trials) and extinction in multiple contexts (1 vs. 3 contexts) could prevent the renewal of extinguished tolerance to the ataxic effect of ethanol with rats.…”
Section: Relapse Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using many extinction trials and multiple contexts of extinction in Pavlovian learning have shown to reduce the recovery of extinguished responses (e.g., Denniston, Chang, & Miller, 2003; González et al, 2016; Gunther, Denniston, & Miller, 1998; Laborda & Miller, 2013; San Martín, Díaz, Cañete, Laborda, & Miguez, 2018). For instance, Experiment 2 in González et al (2016) evaluated whether using massive extinction (12 vs. 60 trials) and extinction in multiple contexts (1 vs. 3 contexts) could prevent the renewal of extinguished tolerance to the ataxic effect of ethanol with rats.…”
Section: Relapse Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when conducted simultaneously, these manipulations did not produce an additive effect of further decreasing relapse, most likely due to a floor effect. The effectiveness of massive extinction to prevent recovery of ethanol tolerance has been recently replicated by San Martín et al (2018).…”
Section: Relapse Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the reduction of CRs due to extinction has been experimentally reproduced in different species, like rats (e.g., Alfaro et al, 2018;Brooks & Bouton, 1993;Bustamante et al, 2019;González et al, 2016;Miguez et al, 2013Miguez et al, , 2014Miller et al, 2015;San Martín et al, 2018), pigeons (e.g., Brooks, 2000, rabbits (Gormezano et al, 1962), monkeys (Mineka et al, 1984), and humans (e.g., Blass et al, 1984;Diaz et al, 2017;Lira et al, 2016;Quezada et al, 2018), this procedure does not permanently eliminate the learned CRs. The immediate effect of extinction is robust, but there are some situations in which extinguished CRs recover.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%