Reading Korean Public Administration: An Application of Lacanian Four Discourses

Abstract

The article attempts to make a discourse analysis on Korean public administration research for the past half century, in terms of Jacque Lacan's theory of the four fundamental discourses. Of the four discourses, the master discourse and university discourse are dominant, while the analytic discourse and hysteric discourse are marginalized. Previous studies have served or justified the three master signifiers in Korean public administration (the hierarchical political power, capitalism, and the U.S. public administration), with little attempt to challenge and change those master signifiers. Some structured mechanisms, like the hierarchical structure of governance and the tripartite disciplinary network, have contributed to the discourse (re)production. The article argues for making efforts to dissolve those reproduction mechanisms, and for a change of discourses in Korean public administration research.We should admit rather that power produces knowledge (and not simply by encouraging it because it serves power or by applying it because it is useful); that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that there I would like to thank N.

Let One Hundred Flowers Bloom, Let One Hundred Thoughts Contend: Political Science with Chinese Characteristics

“…Evidence of indigenization and methodological nationalism (and methodological regionalism) can be found throughout the discipline, as well as in subfields such as public administration and comparative politics. Scholarly calls for indigenization can be found in nations as diverse as Canada [38], Australia [34], Korea [9], and India [26], as well as in regions such as East Asia [22], Central and Eastern Europe [14], and the European Union [36].…”

Political Science and Chinese Political Studies

“…Scholarly calls for indigenization can be found in nations as diverse as Canada (Trent 1987 ) , Australia (Rhodes 2010 ) , Korea (Chung 2007 ) , and India (Mehta 1987 ) , as well as in regions such as East Asia (Lee 2000 ) , Central and Eastern Europe (Drechsler 2000 ) , and the European Union (Rosamond 2008 ) . Indigenization and methodological nationalism are a natural consequence of national pride, national service, and national goals.…”

The Study of Public Administration in the United States

“…It could be that as various countries (re)discover their own traditions in governing, they will also seek to formulate a study of public administration that befits the history and values of their own country. Over the past two decades, it appears that this is happening, and might reduce the ‘overrepresentation’ of American public administration (see, for example, calls for an indigenous study of public administration in South Korea in Jung 2001, p. 32; Chung 2007; see also Raadschelders 2009, pp. 13, 17).…”