2006
DOI: 10.1080/10573560500455711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading and Writing in Co-Taught Secondary School Social Studies Classrooms: A Reality Check

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the purpose of special education is to provide individualized instruction to help mitigate the impact of a specific disability given a task or set of demands (Kauffman & Hallahan, 2005), and implies that practices will be grounded in evidence (Zigmond, 2006). To our first point and question, UDL is somewhat paradoxical within the field of special education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the purpose of special education is to provide individualized instruction to help mitigate the impact of a specific disability given a task or set of demands (Kauffman & Hallahan, 2005), and implies that practices will be grounded in evidence (Zigmond, 2006). To our first point and question, UDL is somewhat paradoxical within the field of special education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combine a general educator's knowledge of standards, curriculum, and content with a special educator's knowledge of differentiation strategies, a Title I teacher's knowledge of research-based reading strategies, or an English language specialist's knowledge, and the result can be impressive. Without time for sharing this expertise, teachers often teach a class the way they have always taught it and there is no "value added" by the second professional educator (Zigmond, 2006;Zigmond & Matta, 2004). Those teams are unable to answer the essential question of co-teaching: How is what we are doing together substantively different, and better for students, than what one of us would do alone?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All eight teachers commonly implemented teacher-generated questions and questions were additionally coded by type-recall or inference; thus each question asked was coded individually. Once all observation data were coded, each five-minute segment was reviewed to identify if reading comprehension instruction was present and if present what types of reading comprehension strategies, practices or activities were implemented during that segment [53]. Interrater reliability data were collected on 25% of the observations and interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observer took continuous notes during the period of all the instruction that was happening in the class, paying particular attention to comprehension instruction, but noting any type of instruction. The template was divided into five-minute segments, which allowed the observer to note what instruction was occurring during each segment [53]. A silent timer was used as a prompt for the observer to move into the next section of the template after five minutes, which helped organized the notes into five-minute blocks.…”
Section: Reading Comprehension Instruction Fieldnotes Templatementioning
confidence: 99%