2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.033001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactor on-off antineutrino measurement with KamLAND

Abstract: The recent long-term shutdown of Japanese nuclear reactors has resulted in a significantly reduced reactor νe flux at KamLAND. This running condition provides a unique opportunity to confirm and constrain backgrounds for the reactor νe oscillation analysis. The data set also has improved sensitivity for other νe signals, in particular νe's produced in β-decays from 238 U and 232 Th within the Earth's interior, whose energy spectrum overlaps with that of reactor νe's. Including constraints on θ13 from accelerat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
405
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(424 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
13
405
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…KamLAND is the largest scintillation detector constructed to date, with a detector mass of 1 kton [12]. As discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KamLAND is the largest scintillation detector constructed to date, with a detector mass of 1 kton [12]. As discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negligible amount of correlated events with a ∼1 s time constant were identified and their contribution in theν e time window determined. (3) (α,n) background for ν e search has been extensively discussed elsewhere [3][4][5][6][7]. The average rate of 210 Po in the dataset is determined to be (14.1±0.2) counts/(day·ton).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the publication of the KamLAND result in Gando et al [2013], new reference models with refined crustal compositions become available in the literature. If the reference model [Enomoto et al 2007] used in the analysis in Gando et al [2013] is replaced with a modern model [Huang et al 2013], the radiogenic heat is estimated to be 14.9 +9.8 −8.3 TW from U and Th.…”
Section: Earth Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the reference model [Enomoto et al 2007] used in the analysis in Gando et al [2013] is replaced with a modern model [Huang et al 2013], the radiogenic heat is estimated to be 14.9 +9.8 −8.3 TW from U and Th. The increase of the radiogenic heat estimation is mainly due to the change in the crustal geo o − e flux contribution, which is the offset of the flux-heat conversion function as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Earth Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%