2015
DOI: 10.1002/pi.4949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivity ratios and copolymer properties of 2‐(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate with methyl methacrylate and styrene

Abstract: Free radical copolymerization kinetics of 2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DPA) with styrene (ST) or methyl methacrylate (MMA) was investigated and the corresponding copolymers obtained were characterized. Polymerization was performed using tert-butylperoxy-2-ethylhexanoate (0.01 mol dm −3 ) as initiator, isothermally (70 ∘ C) to low conversions (<10 wt%) in a wide range of copolymer compositions (10 mol% steps). The reactivity ratios of the monomers were calculated using linear Kelen-Tüdős (KT) and non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, elucidation of kinetic parameters in the complex RP scheme is greatly assisted by tools such as pulsed laser polymerization coupled with size exclusion chromatography (PLP-SEC) to study propagation kinetics, quantum chemical simulation to estimate a variety of rate coefficients, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to determine radical structure and to follow termination kinetics, and in situ proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) spectroscopy as an efficient means to simultaneously track monomer conversion and comonomer/copolymer composition. The cumulative aim of these specialized techniques is a complete kinetic description for each polymerization system, as has been established for certain acrylic solution copolymerizations, , such that simulations can support the accurate prediction of structure/property relationships for new and existing monomer systems. These systematic studies have revealed generalized kinetic trends based on monomer structure so that, for example, copolymer composition can be described as follows: methacrylate/methacrylate copolymerizes with equal monomer addition probabilities, methacrylate/acrylate yields methacrylate-rich copolymer, while methacrylate/styrene tends toward a more alternating structure. However, deviations from these generalizations occur when monomers capable of hydrogen bonding, such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), are introduced to the (co)­polymerization system. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, elucidation of kinetic parameters in the complex RP scheme is greatly assisted by tools such as pulsed laser polymerization coupled with size exclusion chromatography (PLP-SEC) to study propagation kinetics, quantum chemical simulation to estimate a variety of rate coefficients, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to determine radical structure and to follow termination kinetics, and in situ proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) spectroscopy as an efficient means to simultaneously track monomer conversion and comonomer/copolymer composition. The cumulative aim of these specialized techniques is a complete kinetic description for each polymerization system, as has been established for certain acrylic solution copolymerizations, , such that simulations can support the accurate prediction of structure/property relationships for new and existing monomer systems. These systematic studies have revealed generalized kinetic trends based on monomer structure so that, for example, copolymer composition can be described as follows: methacrylate/methacrylate copolymerizes with equal monomer addition probabilities, methacrylate/acrylate yields methacrylate-rich copolymer, while methacrylate/styrene tends toward a more alternating structure. However, deviations from these generalizations occur when monomers capable of hydrogen bonding, such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), are introduced to the (co)­polymerization system. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactivity ratios of MMA and DOBA were reported to be 1.52 and 0.43 respectively in thermal copolymerization, showing that the MMA monomer has a higher reactivity compared to the DOBA monomer . In the copolymerization system of MMA and DPA, the reactivity ratio was 0.86–1.04 for MMA and 0.91–1.07 for DPA, showing nearly random copolymerization behavior . A relatively high reactivity ratio for MMA was reported for copolymerization with DADMAC in DMSO- d 6 with r MMA = 20.49–41.38 and r DADMAC = 0.09–0.33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…20 In the copolymerization system of MMA and DPA, the reactivity ratio was 0.86−1.04 for MMA and 0.91−1.07 for DPA, showing nearly random copolymerization behavior. 21 A relatively high reactivity ratio for MMA was reported for copolymerization with DADMAC in DMSO-d 6 with r MMA = 20.49−41.38 and r DADMAC = 0.09−0.33. 15 By considering that both DOBA and DPA are conjugated monomers but DADMAC is not, these widely varying r values show that the reactivity ratios are sensitive to the other monomer with which MMA is copolymerized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%