Error-in-variables model (EVM) methods require information about variances of input and output measured variables when estimating the parameters in mathematical models for chemical processes. In EVM, using replicate experiments for estimating output measurement variances is complicated because true values of inputs may be different when multiple attempts are made to repeat an experiment. To address this issue, we categorize attempted replicate experiments as: (i) true replicates (TRs) when uncertain inputs are the same in replicated runs and (ii) pseudo replicates (PRs) when measured inputs are the same, but unknown true values of inputs are different. We propose methodologies to obtain output measurement variance estimates and associated parameter estimates for both situations. We also propose bootstrap methods for obtaining joint-confidence information for the resulting parameter estimates.A copolymerization case study is used to illustrate the proposed techniques. We show that different assumptions noticeably affect the uncertainties in the resulting reactivity-ratio estimates.copolymerization, error-in-variables model, Mayo-Lewis equation, reactivity-ratio estimation, replicate experiments
| INTRODUCTIONFundamental mathematical models are widely used for chemical process development and improvement. These models usually contain unknown parameters that require estimation. 1,2 In conventional parameter-estimation methodologies such as weighted least-squares (WLS) estimation, the model inputs are assumed to be perfectly known (i.e., measured without error), while random measurement errors are considered for the model outputs. 3,4 Nevertheless, there are important situations where model inputs are not perfectly known, but contain significant uncertainties. The error-in-variables model (EVM) technique was developed to account for measurement uncertainties in both inputs and outputs during parameter estimation. 5,6 In