1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0987-7053(89)80051-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivite Corticale Au Cours d'Epreuves De Temps De Reaction Chez Les Springers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference between groups should also be detectable as prolonged, extended-focus activations in the sustained-attention-related brain regions (i.e., anterior cingulate, prefrontal and parietal areas). We propose that skilled athletes will show better attentional abilities, which will be reflected as better performance in the sustained-attention task, and that this performance can be related to differences in the various components of the ERP (particularly larger amplitudes in the components related to attention: P100, P200 and P300), consistent with previous reports ( Hack, Memmert & Rupp, 2009 ; Hamon & Seri, 1989 ; Hung et al, 2004 ; Jin et al, 2011 ; Ozmerdivenli et al, 2005 ; Zwierko et al, 2011 ). Moreover, these behavioral and ERP features will likely correlate with greater activation, in skilled athletes, in the brain structures implicated in sustained attention (anterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal, and parietal cortical regions primarily in the right hemisphere) as previous neuropsychological studies report ( Cohen et al, 1992 ; Fink et al, 1997 ; Pardo, Fox & Raichle, 1991 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This difference between groups should also be detectable as prolonged, extended-focus activations in the sustained-attention-related brain regions (i.e., anterior cingulate, prefrontal and parietal areas). We propose that skilled athletes will show better attentional abilities, which will be reflected as better performance in the sustained-attention task, and that this performance can be related to differences in the various components of the ERP (particularly larger amplitudes in the components related to attention: P100, P200 and P300), consistent with previous reports ( Hack, Memmert & Rupp, 2009 ; Hamon & Seri, 1989 ; Hung et al, 2004 ; Jin et al, 2011 ; Ozmerdivenli et al, 2005 ; Zwierko et al, 2011 ). Moreover, these behavioral and ERP features will likely correlate with greater activation, in skilled athletes, in the brain structures implicated in sustained attention (anterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal, and parietal cortical regions primarily in the right hemisphere) as previous neuropsychological studies report ( Cohen et al, 1992 ; Fink et al, 1997 ; Pardo, Fox & Raichle, 1991 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The posterior P200 response to an action-anticipation task was different between professional badminton players and non-players, with professionals showing larger amplitudes than non-players; the authors proposed that the players showed superior action-anticipation abilities associated with an enhanced P200 effect that had a posterior-occipital distribution ( Jin et al, 2011 ). Additionally, larger amplitudes in the P200 component have been found in sprinters compared with other populations; the authors proposed that smaller amplitudes in the control groups could indicate lower attention levels ( Hamon & Seri, 1989 ). Based on these studies and on the hypothesis that the P200 component could be an index of a stimulus-identification process and establishing a perceptual decision ( Lindholm & Koriath, 1985 ), this effect in our results likely reflects some generic training effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies on attention in athletes have investigated how perceptual and cognitive processes are improved as a result of sports practice. Expert athletes have shown better performance than beginners on cognitive tests (Fontani & Lodi, 2002;Hack, Memmert, & Rupp, 2009;Hamon & Seri, 1989;Radlo, Janelle, Barba, & Frehlich, 2001;Taliep et al, 2008). However, differences in cognitive processes among athletes of different athletic disciplines have been studied less frequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous ERP studies on athletes have compared experts with beginners or non-athletes and have found differences between groups in the amplitude and latency of different ERP components. These differences have been associated with expertise, sports discipline and level of task demand [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Additionally, movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) has been studied in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%