1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(80)80067-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions to ionizing radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Lesions resembling keratoses called pseudorecidives sometimes appear in the immediate postradiation period, may resemble tumor recurrences, and often spontaneously resolve without treatment. 17,18 Hair loss may be transient after therapy, and new hair may continue to return for up to a year. Alopecia due to follicular fibrosis may be permanent.…”
Section: Acute Radiation Dermatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Lesions resembling keratoses called pseudorecidives sometimes appear in the immediate postradiation period, may resemble tumor recurrences, and often spontaneously resolve without treatment. 17,18 Hair loss may be transient after therapy, and new hair may continue to return for up to a year. Alopecia due to follicular fibrosis may be permanent.…”
Section: Acute Radiation Dermatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16], Further more. it has been shown that the true substrate for tyrosi nase is the superoxide anion radical (O, ) and not molecu lar oxygen (O,) as previously suggested [17][18][19][20], Based on these recent biochemical observations, a new concept for the treatment of vitiligo was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Patients undergoing repeated cardiac catheterisation and coronary angioplasty procedures have developed chronic radiodermatitis 67 This skin lesion may result in ulceration and transformation into an invasive squamous cell carcinoma with a high risk of metastasis 8. We describe two patients in whom chronic radiodermatitis developed after being exposed twice to radiation during cardiac catheterisation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%