2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291707000815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction time performance in ADHD: improvement under fast-incentive condition and familial effects

Abstract: The data are inconsistent with models that consider RT variability as reflecting a stable cognitive deficit in ADHD, but instead emphasize the extent to which energetic or motivational factors can have a greater effect on RT performance in ADHD. The findings support the role of RT variability as an endophenotype mediating the link between genes and ADHD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
199
5
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
30
199
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is plausible that stimulantinduced increases of conformity could contribute to MPH effects on social behavior. An MPH-induced increase in the incentive of conformity, for example, would be consistent with theories and findings that patients with ADHD have reinforcement learning deficits that can be alleviated by stimulant therapy (Frank et al, 2007;Haenlein and Caul, 1987;Luman et al, 2010;Volkow et al, 2005;Wilkison et al, 1995), enhanced responses to raised incentives (Andreou et al, 2007;Kohls et al, 2009;Luman et al, 2005), deficient psychophysical responding to affective stimuli that can be restored by stimulant medication (Conzelmann et al, 2011;Groen et al, 2009), and reduced hemodynamic responses to reward anticipation in the striatum (Plichta et al, 2009;Stark et al, 2011;Strohle et al, 2008). We therefore propose a new working hypothesis that MPH may improve social behavior and acceptance by peers in ADHD patients, in part, by increasing catecholamine-mediated conformity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, it is plausible that stimulantinduced increases of conformity could contribute to MPH effects on social behavior. An MPH-induced increase in the incentive of conformity, for example, would be consistent with theories and findings that patients with ADHD have reinforcement learning deficits that can be alleviated by stimulant therapy (Frank et al, 2007;Haenlein and Caul, 1987;Luman et al, 2010;Volkow et al, 2005;Wilkison et al, 1995), enhanced responses to raised incentives (Andreou et al, 2007;Kohls et al, 2009;Luman et al, 2005), deficient psychophysical responding to affective stimuli that can be restored by stimulant medication (Conzelmann et al, 2011;Groen et al, 2009), and reduced hemodynamic responses to reward anticipation in the striatum (Plichta et al, 2009;Stark et al, 2011;Strohle et al, 2008). We therefore propose a new working hypothesis that MPH may improve social behavior and acceptance by peers in ADHD patients, in part, by increasing catecholamine-mediated conformity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A modified method of DeFries-Fulker analysis (Andreou et al 2007;DeFries and Fulker 1985;Purcell and Sham 2003) was used to analyse the effect of shared familial influences on symptoms of autism and symptoms of ADHD in our data. DeFries-Fulker analysis uses a comparison of the proband and sibling mean symptom scores with the mean scores of the population.…”
Section: Defries-fulker Analysis Of Familial Influences On Autism Symmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of vertebrate and invertebrate model systems suggest the possibility of genetic variance in residual variability or phenotypic heterogeneity: Drosophila experiments in the 1950s found twice the variance for body size in homozygote flies compared to heterozygotes (Reeve and Robertson 1953) and increasing phenotypic variance for both low-and high-selected lines selected for abdominal bristle number (Clayton and Robertson 1957). Reaction time in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (see Castellanos et al 2005;Russell et al 2006) shares familial effects with intra-individual variability (IIV) in reaction time, suggesting a genetic basis for residual variation (Andreou et al 2007;Wood et al 2009). Genetic effects on residual variance has been observed in several systems including rodent genetic models of ADHD (Perry et al 2010a,b), associations of genotype with thermotolerance in fish (Perry et al 2003), and abdominal bristles in Drosophila (Mackay and Lyman 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%