Proceedings. The IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2002.1041228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction time of the secondary task while driving in various situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [35] most unalerted drivers have shown themselves capable of responding in less than 2.5 s in urgent situations. Similar results can be derived from [11]. The reaction time is lower if the stimuli is not only visual, but it is also vibratory or auditory (see [27]), so an ADAS can inform the driver of an imminent hazard, to increase the probability of an in-time response.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Network Delaysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In [35] most unalerted drivers have shown themselves capable of responding in less than 2.5 s in urgent situations. Similar results can be derived from [11]. The reaction time is lower if the stimuli is not only visual, but it is also vibratory or auditory (see [27]), so an ADAS can inform the driver of an imminent hazard, to increase the probability of an in-time response.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Network Delaysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Certainly, multi-task performance depends on the complexity of tasks. Ihata [8] showed that reaction times while driving and performing a secondary counting task was not impaired with straight roads in comparison to the baseline without counting, but reaction times were delayed with curves, crossings and other cars present, where more attentional resources have to be allocated to the driving.…”
Section: B Task Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%