RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2008
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2008.4600652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing human-machine interaction in manual assembly

Abstract: This contribution introduces a concept for humanmachine interaction in a working environment. A foot pedal based interface was applied for the investigation of capabilities and bottlenecks in human information processing as well as for the user-controlled timing of relevant information presentation. The use of the interaction concept was tested within an experimental study, where complexity of a manual assembly task was varied in order to manipulate respective processing resources. Results were interpreted reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these results, one can conclude that complex assembly primitives benefit more from support by AR-based communication modes than easier ones. The experiments demonstrate an effect of task difficulty and attentional guidance on task performance [162], [163]. The observed interplay of mental processes (e.g., searching for assembly parts or for assembly positions) and action execution (e.g., grasping or joining) seems to be an indicator for task complexity and an important factor for the prediction of performance times.…”
Section: ) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…From these results, one can conclude that complex assembly primitives benefit more from support by AR-based communication modes than easier ones. The experiments demonstrate an effect of task difficulty and attentional guidance on task performance [162], [163]. The observed interplay of mental processes (e.g., searching for assembly parts or for assembly positions) and action execution (e.g., grasping or joining) seems to be an indicator for task complexity and an important factor for the prediction of performance times.…”
Section: ) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Summarizing, complex assembly primitives benefited more from support by AR-based communication modes than easier ones. These results demonstrate a statistical interaction between task difficulty and attentional guidance on task performance [24,39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…interaction forms are becoming more complex with the trend of the application of robots in new contexts, such as human-machine interactions in a working environment [21]. These assistive systems need to be flexible and adaptive.…”
Section: Task Allocation: Worker Skills and Robot Abilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%