2002
DOI: 10.12702/1984-7033.v02n02a12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction of soybean cultivars to sudden death syndrome and disease scoring methods for screening resistance

Abstract: Soybean sudden death syndrome (SDS), caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines, is found in more than 2.0 million hectares of soybean fields in Brazil. Identified for the first time during the 1981/82 crop season, in São Gotardo, Minas Gerais; it had already spread to 99 counties in Central and South Brazil by the 1999/2000 crop season, causing an estimated yield loss of US$ 53 million. Since no efficient control measure is yet available , it has been carried out through resistant cultivars. One of the difficu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ranking of the eight genotypes also correlated well with the field data, showing that the method could be used to predict SDS foliar reaction in the field. Similar correlations between greenhouse and field phenotypic results have also been observed by others using a variety of assays (de Farias Neto et al, 2008; Gray and Achenbach, 1996; Hashmi et al, 2005; Klingelfuss et al, 2002; Li et al, 1999; Mueller et al, 2002; Njiti et al, 2001; Stephens et al, 1993b). While the genotype ranking does not match up identically with field ratings, the observed rank changes are not of concern because the genotypes known to be resistant still performed the best.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ranking of the eight genotypes also correlated well with the field data, showing that the method could be used to predict SDS foliar reaction in the field. Similar correlations between greenhouse and field phenotypic results have also been observed by others using a variety of assays (de Farias Neto et al, 2008; Gray and Achenbach, 1996; Hashmi et al, 2005; Klingelfuss et al, 2002; Li et al, 1999; Mueller et al, 2002; Njiti et al, 2001; Stephens et al, 1993b). While the genotype ranking does not match up identically with field ratings, the observed rank changes are not of concern because the genotypes known to be resistant still performed the best.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Greenhouse and growth chamber assays are also commonly used to evaluate soybean germplasm for resistance to SDS (de Farias Neto et al, 2008; Hashmi et al, 2005). An array of different inoculation methods have been developed, such as soil amendments with oat ( Avena sativa L.) seeds (Stephens et al, 1993b; Melgar and Roy, 1994), sorghum seeds (Hartman et al, 1997; Mueller et al, 2002), cornmeal ( Zea mays L.) (Gray and Achenbach, 1996; Njiti et al, 2001), and toothpicks (Klingelfuss et al, 2002; Melgar and Roy, 1994) infested with F. virguliforme . In some methods, inoculum is homogeneously mixed with the plant growing medium and then applied in a layer below the seeds at planting (Hashmi et al, 2005; Njiti et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have evaluated SDS resistance under greenhouse conditions by inoculating plants with FSG infested oat (Stephens et al, 1993) or sorghum seeds (Hartman et al, 1997;Mueller, 2001), cornmeal (Njiti et al, 2001) or toothpicks (Klingelfuss et al, 2002). Stephens et al (1993) evaluated the SDS reactions of 12 soybean cultivars, infected with FSG infested oat seeds, in pots, in a greenhouse and in the fi eld, under natural and under inoculation conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em todas as leituras, foi observada diferença significativa na severidade de doença entre as cultivares Conquista e FT Estrela (Figura 1), confirmando assim, a diferença no nível de resistência à SMS entre esses dois genótipos (Klingelfuss et al, 2002). Foi observada maior diferença entre as cultivares e entre os tratamentos nas avaliações realizadas aos 18 e 21 dae, no primeiro e segundo experimentos, respectivamente (Figuras 1 e 2).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Cada parcela foi constituída de um vaso plástico, contendo aproximadamente 2 kg de substrato, composto por solo previamente desinfestado, areia e matéria orgânica na proporção 2:1:1. Em cada vaso, foram colocadas duas sementes da cultivar Conquista (moderadamente resistente) e duas da cultivar FT Estrela, considerada como padrão de susceptibilidade (Klingelfuss et al, 2002). Após a germinação, fez-se o desbaste, deixando uma planta de cada cultivar.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified