1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00472542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction of 2-chloro-5-methylbenzoquinone with ?-aminocrotonic ester derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of substituents at N1 and C3 was not obvious but it can be thought that they imposed steric hindrance, as already noted by some authors. [41] The yields were probably affected by the solubility of the catalyst in CPME and the ability to coordinate to the substrates and intermediates. Interestingly compound 4 ad was obtained with a considerably higher yield (50 %) compared to literature (15 %).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of substituents at N1 and C3 was not obvious but it can be thought that they imposed steric hindrance, as already noted by some authors. [41] The yields were probably affected by the solubility of the catalyst in CPME and the ability to coordinate to the substrates and intermediates. Interestingly compound 4 ad was obtained with a considerably higher yield (50 %) compared to literature (15 %).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The 1 H and 13 C chemical shifts of the signal for the benzylidene pro ton also differ largely: δ 9.14 and 166.6 for compound 6 and δ 7.88, 8.06 and 79.1, 83.1 for compound 7, respec tively. 20 The 1 H and 13 C chemical shifts of the signal for the benzylidene pro ton also differ largely: δ 9.14 and 166.6 for compound 6 and δ 7.88, 8.06 and 79.1, 83.1 for compound 7, respec tively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%