2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-018-9532-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactance to Electronic Surveillance: a Test of Antecedents and Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms by which surveillance EPM may lead to decreased performance. Psychological reactance (Brehm, 1966), the process that creates a tension when behavioral freedom is reduced or threatened with reduction and leads to actions meant to regain those freedoms, may cause individuals to withhold effort or engage in other CWBs as a means of regaining freedom when faced with the loss of freedom resulting from surveillance EPM (Yost, Behrend, Howardson, Darrow, & Jensen, 2019). Overall, evidence suggests that organizations should not let technological capability dictate what and how they monitor but, rather, provide a clear rationale and purpose for EPM.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms by which surveillance EPM may lead to decreased performance. Psychological reactance (Brehm, 1966), the process that creates a tension when behavioral freedom is reduced or threatened with reduction and leads to actions meant to regain those freedoms, may cause individuals to withhold effort or engage in other CWBs as a means of regaining freedom when faced with the loss of freedom resulting from surveillance EPM (Yost, Behrend, Howardson, Darrow, & Jensen, 2019). Overall, evidence suggests that organizations should not let technological capability dictate what and how they monitor but, rather, provide a clear rationale and purpose for EPM.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual differences in personality moderate the effects of EPM on individual reactions. For example, individuals higher in reactance tend to perceive EPM as more of an invasion of privacy, with perceptions of privacy invasion mediating the relationship between trait reactance and anger and negative cognitions regarding EPM (Yost et al, 2019). Zweig and Webster (2003) found that respondents lower in extraversion and emotional stability were relatively less likely to have positive attitudes toward monitoring.…”
Section: Individual and Organizational Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much like the classic Hawthorne studies (Roethlisberger & Dickson, 1939), when employees know they are being continuously surveilled, the implementation of data‐gathering and automated technologies in the workplace may yield unintended negative effects on employees responses/behaviours (e.g. approaching customers more than is necessary), and reactions will likely vary depending on personal characteristics (Yost, Behrend, Howardson, Darrow, & Jensen, 2019) and demographic characteristics (e.g. age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socio‐economic status).…”
Section: A Framework For Big Data In the Personality Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the affective perspective, previous studies have suggested that Internet monitoring can violate employees' information privacy (Alder et al, 2008;Firoz et al, 2006;Parenti, 2001; Tabak and Smith, 2005), which may further result in employees' anger (Yost et al, 2019). According to AET, organizational events (e.g., Internet monitoring) that engender employees' negative affective reactions such as anger can result in employees' dissatisfaction with the events.…”
Section: The Impact Of Internet Monitoring On Employees' Policy Satismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given that Internet plays an important role in performing job tasks, even if the objective of Internet monitoring is to curb employees' inappropriate Internet usage (e.g., cyberloafing or IS security violations), employees may perceive that their work-related Internet usage is also monitored. As a result, employees may have serious information privacy concerns due to Internet monitoring and may become angry with the monitoring(Yost et al, 2019). Such anger may arise even when employees use the Internet for work-related purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%