2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-visiting ICM theory and practice: Lessons learned from the Baltic Sea Region

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other case studies, time lags between stakeholder participation process and implementation of a measure turned out to be a major problem (Støttrup et al, Schernewski et al 2017). An implementation years after the decision process, can cause a loss of ownership and political support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other case studies, time lags between stakeholder participation process and implementation of a measure turned out to be a major problem (Støttrup et al, Schernewski et al 2017). An implementation years after the decision process, can cause a loss of ownership and political support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we applied the Systems Approach Framework (SAF) and tested if it is a suitable methodology to support and implement the ideas of an Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in this concrete case. The SAF is a stepwise, userfriendly methodology with high practical relevance that allows addressing problems and challenges in the coastal zone in a systematic way (Hopkins et al 2011;Støttrup et al 2017). It includes an integrated Ecological-Social-Economic (ESE) assessment in close cooperation with stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall task of the project is to apply the SAF for analysis and solving of essential coastal issues that have to be identified and addressed by involving stake-holders. This method has been developed and assessed in other cases around the Baltic Sea [5], [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Commission defined ICZM as a dynamic, multi-disciplinary, and iterative process to promote sustainable management of coastal zones while covering the full cycle of information collection, planning, decision-making, management, and monitoring of implementation [9]. Unfortunately, in practice, ICZM shows several weaknesses, such as an insufficient application of a broad holistic and long-term approach, a lack of adaptive management [10,11], and a shortage in genuine stakeholder engagement, thus ignoring vital social needs of local communities [11][12][13][14]. As a consequence, ICZM vanished from the political agenda in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%