2010
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031-163.2.280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examining the Importance of Fish in the Diets of Stream-dwelling Crayfishes: Implications for Food Web Analyses and Conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Salamanders, such as the species we studied, do have small, stable home ranges (e.g., Kleeberger and Werner 1982;Camp and Lee 1996;Lowe 2003;Peterman et al 2008). However, since deciduous litter has a relatively consistent δ 13 C (δ 13 C ~ -27‰) signature across much of the eastern deciduous forest range of North America (e.g., Walters et al 2007;Taylor and Soucek 2010), we think that local spatial variation in the stable isotope levels of basal resources is unlikely to explain the individual variation we observed among salamanders. Third, individual salamanders may differ physiologically, affecting how stable isotopes fractionate within the individual or how isotopes are routed among tissues within the individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Salamanders, such as the species we studied, do have small, stable home ranges (e.g., Kleeberger and Werner 1982;Camp and Lee 1996;Lowe 2003;Peterman et al 2008). However, since deciduous litter has a relatively consistent δ 13 C (δ 13 C ~ -27‰) signature across much of the eastern deciduous forest range of North America (e.g., Walters et al 2007;Taylor and Soucek 2010), we think that local spatial variation in the stable isotope levels of basal resources is unlikely to explain the individual variation we observed among salamanders. Third, individual salamanders may differ physiologically, affecting how stable isotopes fractionate within the individual or how isotopes are routed among tissues within the individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In general, soft bodied animals, including mayfly nymphs and fish, are more easily digested by crayfish. There were no food components in our specimens reliably identifiable as fish parts; however, Taylor and Soucek [39] point out that the presence of fish in crayfish stomachs is often underestimated. On the other hand, hard-shelled remains and particles may be present for a longer time in the cardiac stomach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Plants were the most common food item present in O. limosus stomachs, but the relative highest volume of stomach contents was composed of detritus, with plants second, and animal matter third. Plants have a lower nutritional value compared with animals [39,44,45]. Chucholl [26], as well as Hollows et al [46], identified detritus as the most important food component in stomachs of O. immunis and Paranephrops zealandicus (White, 1847), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there was no high-quality habitat within a segment, we sampled the fi rst 1-m 2 area at the downstream end of the segment. A seine net was placed perpendicular to the stream fl ow, and a 1-m 2 area of substrate upstream of the net was disturbed so that all crayfi sh were washed into the seine net (Mather and Stein 1993, Flinders and Magoulick 2003, Taylor and Soucek 2010. When necessary in low-fl ow areas, we dragged the seine net through the sampling area while disturbing the substrate to collect crayfi sh.…”
Section: Occupancy Surveys and Crayfi Sh Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%