2022
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2022-733
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-evaluating cloud chamber constraints on depositional ice growth in cirrus clouds – Part 1: Model description and sensitivity tests

Abstract: Abstract. Ice growth from vapor deposition is an important process for the evolution of cirrus clouds, but the physics of depositional ice growth at the low temperatures (<235 K) characteristic of the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere is not well understood. Surface attachment kinetics, generally parameterized as a deposition coefficient αD, are expected to limit growth rates in certain cases, but significant discrepancies between experimental measurements have not been satisfactorily explained. Experime… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(117 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We support the notion that supersaturation‐ and size‐dependent deposition coefficients resolve an apparent contradiction between high versus low values previously inferred from measurements (K. D. Lamb et al., 2022). The fact that overall water vapor uptake is not strongly inhibited suggests that the use of constant, high values (>0.1) for the ice deposition coefficient might be appropriate in cirrus models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We support the notion that supersaturation‐ and size‐dependent deposition coefficients resolve an apparent contradiction between high versus low values previously inferred from measurements (K. D. Lamb et al., 2022). The fact that overall water vapor uptake is not strongly inhibited suggests that the use of constant, high values (>0.1) for the ice deposition coefficient might be appropriate in cirrus models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Here, we focus on potential growth limitations and employ supersaturation‐dependent deposition coefficients conflating two major growth modes (dislocation and step nucleation growth), generalizing the approach used by K. D. Lamb et al. (2022) to analyze laboratory measurements. We thereby provide insights that are needed for improved model simulations and better validation of ice supersaturation and cirrus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ice crystal growth from water vapor is known to be sensitive to crystal surface properties (Magee et al, 2014) as well as the ambient temperature and supersaturation. Many laboratory studies have tried to quantify the water vapor deposition coefficient (Skrotzki et al, 2013;Lamb et al, 2023), which influences cirrus cloud microphysical and radiative properties. Moreover, changes in the preferential partitioning of water isotopes by non-equilibrium kinematic effects during ice deposition gives insight into ice crystal surface kinetics and deposition coefficients (Nelson, 2011;Lamb et al, 2017).…”
Section: Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory development will most likely be based on controlled laboratory experiments. Measurements in large aerosol chambers may provide a link between laboratory and real-world conditions (Lamb et al, 2017). Any progress in this direction will improve estimates of ice crystal fall speeds and aggregation efficiencies and thus the simulation of anvil life cycle (Sect.…”
Section: What Controls Cloud Ice Growth From Vapor?mentioning
confidence: 99%