2019
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Re)Defining success in epilepsy surgery: The importance of relative seizure reduction in patient‐reported quality of life

Abstract: Objective Previous work has suggested that seizure outcome is the most important predictor of quality of life (QoL) after epilepsy surgery, but it is unknown which specific seizure outcome measure should be used in judging surgical success. We assess three different seizure outcome measures (relative seizure reduction, absolute seizure reduction, and seizure freedom [yes/no]) to investigate which measure best predicts postoperative QoL. Methods We prospectively surveyed patients at outpatient visits before and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CC1 and CC2 are comparable, which agrees with current data suggesting that lesional and temporal lobe epilepsy have the highest rates of surgical success [55,56,57,58]. Extratemporal (CC4) and multi-focal (CC4) patients tend to have lower success rates due to insufficient localizations and thus the neural fragility confidence in those SOZ localizations should be low [55,59,60,61]. Finally, we examine the success probability differences based on gender, handedness, onset age and surgery age to show that there are no relevant differences (Supplemental Figure 19).…”
Section: Fragility Correlates With Clinical Complexity and Treatment supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CC1 and CC2 are comparable, which agrees with current data suggesting that lesional and temporal lobe epilepsy have the highest rates of surgical success [55,56,57,58]. Extratemporal (CC4) and multi-focal (CC4) patients tend to have lower success rates due to insufficient localizations and thus the neural fragility confidence in those SOZ localizations should be low [55,59,60,61]. Finally, we examine the success probability differences based on gender, handedness, onset age and surgery age to show that there are no relevant differences (Supplemental Figure 19).…”
Section: Fragility Correlates With Clinical Complexity and Treatment supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Challenges in validating iEEG features as SOZ markers Many features have been proposed as potential biomarkers for the SOZ, but none have successfully translated into the clinical workflow [27,26,28,62,63,55,31]. Current limitations for evaluating computational approaches to localization can be largely attributed to i) the lack of ground-truth labels for the true underlying SOZ (it cannot be observed in practice because there is no biomarker), ii) insufficient benchmarking to other iEEG features and iii) a lack in sufficient sampling across epilepsy etiologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, few patients in our study had high-grade gliomas (5) and meningiomas (2). These patients showed favorable outcome during the rst-year post epilepsy surgery (60% and 100%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Seizures have negative impact on quality of life, particularly in social, economic and cognitive domains and increases the risk of sudden unexpected death (SUDEP) in epilepsy has been established, [1] however post epilepsy surgery seizure reduction and/or freedom has been shown to improve quality of life. [2] While approximately 30-50% of patients with brain tumors have epilepsy as an initial presentation, [3] 6-45% of patients with brain tumors develop seizures later in their life. [4,5] Although the exact mechanism of development of seizures in patients with brain tumors is not clearly understood, recent studies have identi ed that some changes in the peritumoral regions play a role in the release of neurotransmitters that lead to the development of seizures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of DRE is the main motivation to continue the development of new drugs and for surgical epilepsy therapies with the stated goal of eliminating all seizures, regardless of their type. Although worthwhile efforts at finding a “cure” should continue, recent data highlight the benefits of seizure reduction in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery, even when seizure‐freedom is not accomplished 9 . This observation opens the door for several currently unanswered clinical questions: What are the benefits of seizure reduction—by itself—in the larger population of medically treated patients with DRE, and are these benefits influenced by seizure characteristics, particularly seizure type?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%