The terminology, definitions, and methods to determine adherence and persistence differ greatly in the published literature. The appropriateness and choice of the specific measure employed should be determined by the overall goals of the study, as well as the relative advantages and limitations of the measures.

The PIQoL-AD is a valuable instrument for inclusion in clinical trials and routine clinical practice. It provides distinct and complementary information to that of existing dermatology-specific measures and has been shown to be responsive to changes in QoL in clinical trials.

These results suggest that, in a usual-care setting, patients receiving valsartan (relative to amlodipine or lisinopril) appear to be more compliant and persistent with pharmacologic therapy, independent of patient chronic disease burden.

The QoLIAD is a practical, reliable, valid and culturally applicable instrument for measuring the impact of AD and its treatment on QoL in clinical trials or in routine clinical practice.

The objective of the study was to assess factors associated with treatment satisfaction among patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. A weighted crosssectional online survey was conducted with hypertensive patients participating in a chronic disease panel in the US. Patients on monotherapy with medications from the following classes were identified: ACE inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics. The control group included patients without treatment. Pairwise comparisons between groups were conducted for factors that may affect patients' satisfaction. The study population had a mean age of 54.7714.2 years and was 56.7% female. Participants with blood pressure (BP) controlled to JNC 7 guidelines were more satisfied with their medication than those with uncontrolled BP (90.3 vs 71.5%, Po0.05). Patients who had not experienced adverse events had higher satisfaction than patients experiencing adverse events (90.9 vs 75.8%, Po0.05). The most frequently self-reported adverse events were frequent urination, sexual dysfunction, and fatigue ranging from 7.0 to 9.6% across classes. The adverse event rates differed by class and were lowest among the ARBs. Patients on ARBs were the most likely to have switched from a previous antihypertensive class as compared to other classes (57.1% ARBs vs 49.8% ACEIs, 38.7% diuretics, 36.3% CCBs, and 31.7% BBs). Physician recommendation was the most common reason for switching. In conclusion, the ability to effectively treat hypertension depends upon a patient's satisfaction with antihypertensive therapy, which may be improved by achieving BP control and minimizing the occurrence of adverse events.

No abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome is a significant financial burden on the employer that arises from an increase in direct and indirect costs compared with the control group.

This research (1) extends 6-month clinical trial outcomes to an 8-year period, (2) translates health outcomes from technical clinical endpoints to quality-adjusted survival, and (3) estimates economic consequences of therapeutic outcomes. The results quantify the favorable long-term health (i.e., quality-adjusted survival) and economic benefits (i.e., lower total medical costs) of therapy with valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, versus amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria based on an extension of the results of a short-term clinical (MARVAL) trial. These research findings are important to the extent patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria do not receive the recommended antihypertensive agents that block the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers).