The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iceaa.2009.5297400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RCS measurements and predictions of different targets for radar benchmark purpose

Abstract: This paper presents Radar Cross Section (RCS) measurements of different targets suitable for electromagnetic software comparison and validation. The targets have been designed, fabricated and measured at INTA to study different scattering mechanisms such as reflection and diffraction on curved surfaces and edges (truncated cone), reflection and diffraction on planar surfaces and straight wedges (triangular prism) or tip diffraction and travelling waves (conesphere). These measurements can be used as a valuable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed parallel higher-order basis MoM methodology, two benchmarks of a truncated cone and a Y-8 plane are simulated to calculate their RCS, respectively. [7]. This benchmark is an end-capped truncated cone oriented along the z-axis and centred in the plane z = 0 (illustrated in Figure 5).…”
Section: Comparison With the Measurement Results And Parallelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed parallel higher-order basis MoM methodology, two benchmarks of a truncated cone and a Y-8 plane are simulated to calculate their RCS, respectively. [7]. This benchmark is an end-capped truncated cone oriented along the z-axis and centred in the plane z = 0 (illustrated in Figure 5).…”
Section: Comparison With the Measurement Results And Parallelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the accuracy of our implementation of the SBR algorithm, various canonical objects, whose RCS has been either analytically calculated or is numerically well documented in the literature [26,27], are chosen. Our simulator is tested with these benchmark objects for different look angles and frequencies.…”
Section: Validation With Benchmark Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%