2003
DOI: 10.1078/1617-1381-00059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RBSim 2: simulating the complex interactions between human movement and the outdoor recreation environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some models of geographic processes treat agents as interacting mobile individuals [4,14,21,25,43,46] and others as stationary units that make decisions affecting land-use and land-cover change [17,30,31], there is a general consensus that agents are autonomous units that share an environment through an agent community and behave in a manner to reach their goals [3,8]. This has made ABMs appealing for simulating numerous resource management scenarios, including agricultural land use [17,33], forest recreation [14,25], management of wildlife [1,5], fisheries [46] and water [16], and other processes falling in the category of land-use/ cover change (LUCC). With regards to forest management, ABMs can be linked with geographic information systems (GIS) in order to understand the spatial characteristics of harvesting patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some models of geographic processes treat agents as interacting mobile individuals [4,14,21,25,43,46] and others as stationary units that make decisions affecting land-use and land-cover change [17,30,31], there is a general consensus that agents are autonomous units that share an environment through an agent community and behave in a manner to reach their goals [3,8]. This has made ABMs appealing for simulating numerous resource management scenarios, including agricultural land use [17,33], forest recreation [14,25], management of wildlife [1,5], fisheries [46] and water [16], and other processes falling in the category of land-use/ cover change (LUCC). With regards to forest management, ABMs can be linked with geographic information systems (GIS) in order to understand the spatial characteristics of harvesting patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of plausibility and trust can thus adhere to simulations of future events and trends, or of interventions to manage or mitigate certain future scenarios (e.g. Batty et al, 2003b;Itami et al, 2003;Straatman et al, 2004, Bennett & Tang, 2006Ligmann-Zielinska & Jankowski, 2007). It is the assessment of validity and attendant calibration of multi-agent models which is at the core of this paper.…”
Section: Challenges In Assessing the Validity And Usefulness Of Multimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable breadth in the range of theoretical approaches that are considered when modeling navigation and way-finding in these traditions. For example, models have been used to examine the economy of movement in retail streetscapes relative to particular points of interest [217], way-finding in emergency contexts with unfamiliarity and stress [218], the influence of errors and misjudgment on agents' way-finding [219], hierarchy in how information is stored and prioritized [220][221][222], and the role of affordances in weighting decisions [223]. Work in formalizing the concepts that these behaviors share as ontology is particularly well-developed [224,225].…”
Section: Behavioral Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%