2012
DOI: 10.5815/ijigsp.2012.10.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RBCs and Parasites Segmentation from Thin Smear Blood Cell Images

Abstract: Abstract-Manually examine the blood smear for the detection of malaria parasite consumes lot of time for trend pathologists. As the computational power increases, the role of automatic visual inspection becomes more important. An automated system is therefore needed to complete as much work as possible for the identification of malaria parasites. The given scheme based on used of RGB color space, G layer processing, and segmentation of Red Blood Cells (RBC) as well as cell parasites by auto-thresholding with o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Frean (2009) has introduced an algorithm for identifying malaria parasitemia from thick blood smear images with a 14.3% discrepancy rate. SVM with radial basis function-based parasite identification methodology provides 93.12% sensitivity and 93.17% specificity for automatic Panchbhai et al (2012) Morphological approach Discrepancy:5.82 Arco et al (2015) Morphological approach Discrepancy:3.54 Memeu (2014) Artificial neural network Accuracy:79 parasitemia (Savkare & Narote, 2011). Kumarasamy et al (2011) proposed SVM-based parasitemia detection methodology where they have achieved 80% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frean (2009) has introduced an algorithm for identifying malaria parasitemia from thick blood smear images with a 14.3% discrepancy rate. SVM with radial basis function-based parasite identification methodology provides 93.12% sensitivity and 93.17% specificity for automatic Panchbhai et al (2012) Morphological approach Discrepancy:5.82 Arco et al (2015) Morphological approach Discrepancy:3.54 Memeu (2014) Artificial neural network Accuracy:79 parasitemia (Savkare & Narote, 2011). Kumarasamy et al (2011) proposed SVM-based parasitemia detection methodology where they have achieved 80% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological and two stage classification-based parasitemia detection methodology performs 98% sensitivity and 96% positive predictive value . Panchbhai et al (2012) introduced morphology-based parasite enumeration methodology with 5.82% discrepancy rate. Arco et al (2015) have reported parasite enumeration detection with 96.44% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2 when the highest widal is less than 80 it means that the patient have no typhoid and belong to class zero(0), when patient"s widal count highest is 80 or 60 then it means that the patient belong to class one(1). Finally, when a patient"s highest widal count is more than 160 then the patient belong to class two (2). The same applied to Table 3 just that instead of widal count we used MP.…”
Section: Input-output Data Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li [3] proposed a series of digital image processing methods, such as gray stretch, median filter, threshold segmentation, edge extraction, and detection, to detect the variations of red blood cells for identifying the shapes of variable red blood cells. Panchbhai [4] proposed an automating process of blood smear screening for malaria parasite detection. Maitra [5] proposed an approach to automatic segmentation and counting of red blood cells in microscopic blood cell images using Hough Transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%