2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2203546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationales for Corporate Risk Management - A Critical Literature Review

Abstract: This paper describes theoretical motivations for corporate risk management activities and empirical evidence provided by different scholars on such rationales. These theoretical considerations can be extended also to the new risk management practices such as enterprise risk management. Based on modern financial theory's assumption that markets are perfectly efficient, organizations should not implement risk management practices since they cannot contribute to add firm value. However, in the presence of market … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(280 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the number of assets included in the portfolio is high and these assets are not perfectly correlated, the unsystematic component of the portfolio risk diminishes. The CAPM shows that investors only get compensated for holding systematic risk, since the firm-specific component of risk can be eliminated through diversification (Monda, Giorgino, & Modolin, 2013).Thus, agency problems between shareholders and managers arise just because managers face total risk (systematic risk as well as unsystematic risk), whereas shareholders face only the systematic component of total risk, since they can diversify away the firm-specific risk of their positions. Hence, the risk associated with managers' income is closely related to the firm's risk.…”
Section: Capital Asset Pricing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the number of assets included in the portfolio is high and these assets are not perfectly correlated, the unsystematic component of the portfolio risk diminishes. The CAPM shows that investors only get compensated for holding systematic risk, since the firm-specific component of risk can be eliminated through diversification (Monda, Giorgino, & Modolin, 2013).Thus, agency problems between shareholders and managers arise just because managers face total risk (systematic risk as well as unsystematic risk), whereas shareholders face only the systematic component of total risk, since they can diversify away the firm-specific risk of their positions. Hence, the risk associated with managers' income is closely related to the firm's risk.…”
Section: Capital Asset Pricing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perusahaan yang memiliki financial leverage yang tinggi berarti memiliki utang yang tinggi dan menyebabkan risiko yang tinggi ketika melunasinya terutama utang dalam bentuk valuta asing, sehingga perusahaan melakukan hedging untuk meminimalkan risiko tersebut (Gewar & Suryantini, 2020;Jayanti & Yadnya, 2020;Mahardini et al, 2020). Teori keagenan menjelaskan bahwa perusahaan dengan rasio utang terhadap ekuitas yang tinggi melakukan hedging untuk mengurangi biaya keagenan yang dimilikinya (Monda et al, 2013).Teori ekonomi keuangan Modigliani & Miller (1958) Faktor ketiga adalah likuiditas. Likuiditas perusahaan yang tinggi menunjukkan perusahaan tersebut likuid karena dapat membayar utang jangka pendeknya tepat waktu Sasmita dan Hartono, (2019) atau aset lancar perusahaan lebih besar daripada jumlah utang (Mahasari & Rahyuda, 2020).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The present paper attempts to fill this gap by bringing new evidence in the empirical literature by analyzing a mediating effect of a firm's risk on the relationship of derivative usage with firm value. As, risk management theorists state that derivatives increase firm value by reducing firm's risk (Froot et al, 1993;Tufano, 1998;Monda et al, 2013;Bartram et al, 2011;Phan et al, 2014). Literature, however, has shown a significant association between derivative usage and firm value, but empirical analysis of 'how' this relationship occurs is still unavailable.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%