2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35985-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational truncation of aptamer for cross-species application to detect krait envenomation

Abstract: In majority of snakebite cases, the snake responsible for the bite remains unidentified. The traditional snakebite diagnostics method relies upon clinical symptoms and blood coagulation assays that do not provide accurate diagnosis which is important for epidemiological as well as diagnostics point of view. On the other hand, high batch-to-batch variations in antibody performance limit its application for diagnostic assays. In recent years, nucleic acid aptamers have emerged as a strong chemical rival of antib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significantly lower immunoreactivity and binding affinity towards krait venom as compared to cobra venom may be attributed to the lower level of expression of cytotoxins in krait venom ( Fig 2B ). Aptamers have been selected against Phospholipase A2 for the detection of krait venom [ 42 , 43 ]. Even so, the universal presence of this protein in both elapid and viper venoms raise questions on its utility as a marker for species-specific venom identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significantly lower immunoreactivity and binding affinity towards krait venom as compared to cobra venom may be attributed to the lower level of expression of cytotoxins in krait venom ( Fig 2B ). Aptamers have been selected against Phospholipase A2 for the detection of krait venom [ 42 , 43 ]. Even so, the universal presence of this protein in both elapid and viper venoms raise questions on its utility as a marker for species-specific venom identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the truncated aptamer Gli4-T was employed as capture element while the 401/21 antibody was employed as the signaling element. In a previous work, the process of truncation of non-essential nucleotides was reported to improve the accessibility of the target to the aptamer, allowing the formation of a stronger aptamer-target complex [44]. Gli4-T is the truncated aptamer derived from Gli4 which preserves a motif capable of effectively binding gliadin (Fig.…”
Section: Gliadin Quantification By Paper-based Biosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, where there is divergence and homology is decreased, the binding site may only be amenable to very small binders that have been generated to other species' proteins. In a similar manner to nanobodies being smaller versions of antibodies, an aptamer is fairly easy to truncate to its smallest functional form, which may increase its possibility of binding to multiple species [70][71][72] Of note for the use of combinatorial libraries, it is possible to take the sequence of the targeting moiety and mutate this sequence with multiple mutations to find one that will bind to a different species' protein, though depending on the format of the assay and the knowledge of the other protein, this may not be possible [73]. However, there are several other protocols available that might be amenable for developing targeting agents.…”
Section: Towards a Better System Of Detecting Proteome Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, and highlighting the point earlier made about the size of the binding region, there have been a few studies that have truncated aptamers to enhance their cross-species reactivity. For example, Dhiman et al truncated an aptamer from 40 nucleotides to 26 nucleotides to recognize toxins from two different snake species [70]. One study has investigated the ability of three different aptamers to bind to thrombin in six different species (human, bovine, porcine, rabbit, rat, and mouse).…”
Section: Fishing For Homology: Potential Protocols For Developing Tarmentioning
confidence: 99%