2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13036-020-00252-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational design of nonstoichiometric bioceramic scaffolds via digital light processing: tuning chemical composition and pore geometry evaluation

Abstract: Bioactive ceramics are promising candidates as 3D porous substrates for bone repair in bone regenerative medicine. However, they are often inefficient in clinical applications due to mismatching mechanical properties and compromised biological performances. Herein, the additional Sr dopant is hypothesized to readily adjust the mechanical and biodegradable properties of the dilute Mg-doped wollastonite bioceramic scaffolds with different pore geometries (cylindrical-, cubic-, gyroid-) by ceramic stereolithograp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The porous architectures of bioceramic scaffolds were designed by computer-assisted design (Materialise Magics 21.0) and then fabricated by DLP-based 3D printing (Ten Dimensions Technology Co., Beijing) . The 3D porous model (8 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm; Scheme A) with an appropriate pore size (350–500 μm) and a smooth curve on one side could readily match the defect cavity and new bone tissue ingrowth.…”
Section: Experiments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The porous architectures of bioceramic scaffolds were designed by computer-assisted design (Materialise Magics 21.0) and then fabricated by DLP-based 3D printing (Ten Dimensions Technology Co., Beijing) . The 3D porous model (8 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm; Scheme A) with an appropriate pore size (350–500 μm) and a smooth curve on one side could readily match the defect cavity and new bone tissue ingrowth.…”
Section: Experiments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porous architectures of bioceramic scaffolds were designed by computer-assisted design (Materialise Magics 21.0) and then fabricated by DLP-based 3D printing (Ten Dimensions Technology Co., Beijing). 38 The 3D porous model (8 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm; Scheme 1A) with an appropriate pore size (350−500 μm) 39 and a smooth curve on one side could readily match the defect cavity and new bone tissue ingrowth. After undergoing ultrasonic cleaning and hot-air drying at 60 °C, the printed 3D porous bodies were sintered at 1150 °C for 2 h in a microcontroller-controlled temperature furnace (Kejing Co., Hefei, Anhui, China) with a temperature rising rate of 2 °C/min followed by naturally cooling.…”
Section: Reagents and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provided a novel direction for the design of bionic structures for implants. Lv et al 140 designed three structures including cylindrical, lithophane, and TPMS, and controlled the implant porosity at ∼58% and pore size at ∼600 μm. The implants were accurately prepared by DLP.…”
Section: Cellular Structure Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic design of the graded TPMS stents. a) Designed 3D pore shape of the porous models and pore unit cells (cylindrical, cubic, and gyroid) . Reproduced with permission from ref .…”
Section: Future Perspectives For Additive Manufacturing Of Bioceramic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Zhang et al (2020) recently prepared a structurally diversified Haversian bone-mimicking scaffold via DLP-based 3D printing using bioceramic Ca2MgSi2O7, which is hard to fabricate through the FDM printing method. However, the existing published reports mainly dealt with the fabrication process and parameters of DLP printed bioceramic scaffold, but lack the subsequent systematic biological evaluations for bone regeneration application ( Li et al, 2021 ). Recently, there is a growing interest in developing HA/β-TCP biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) bioceramics as bone scaffolding materials because they are more effective in bone regeneration than pure HA or pure ß -TCP, and have a controllable degradation rate ( Kim and Park, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%