Rational/antiemotional behaviors in interpersonal relationships and the functional prognosis of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Japanese multicenter, longitudinal study

Abstract

BackgroundThe repression of negative emotions is a personality factor that received considerable attention in the 1950-60s as being relevant to the onset and course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite subsequent, repeated criticisms of the cross-sectional nature of the earlier studies, even to date few prospective studies have been reported on this issue. This multicenter study prospectively examined if “rational and antiemotional” behavior (antiemotionality), characterized by an extreme tendency to suppress emotional behaviors and to rationalize negative experiences in conflicting interpersonal situations, is associated with the functional prognosis of patients with RA.Methods532 patients with RA who regularly visited one of eight hospitals/clinics in Japan in 2000 were recruited for study. All completed a self-administered baseline questionnaire about lifestyle and psychosocial factors including antiemotionality. Two years after, 460 (mean age, 56.1 years; 54 men and 406 women) of 471 patients who continued to visit the clinics agreed to take the follow-up questionnaire. The functional status of the patients was evaluated by rheumatologists based on the ACR classification system.ResultsA multiple logistic regression model that included baseline demographic, disease activity/severity-related, therapeutic, and socioeconomic factors as covariates found a tendency toward higher antiemotionality to be related to poorer functional status at follow-up. This relationship was not explained by lifestyle factors.ConclusionsAntiemotionality may be a prognostic factor for the functional status of patients with RA. This finding sheds light on a seemingly forgotten issue in the care of patients with RA.

Emotional repression in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatism

“…Nagano and al. (17) showed that, for RA patients, rational/anti-emotional behaviors, characterized by an extreme tendency to squelch emotional behaviors and rationalize negative experiences, was associated with poorer prognoses. Ishii and al.…”

Is emotional restraint a healthy response to adversity?

“…A prospective examination of 532 patients in Japan with rheumatoid arthritis found that "rational and anti-emotional behaviour," measured using patients' responses to a questionnaire, was linked with poorer functional outcome two years later. 22 Another Japanese study found that mood disturbances after mastectomy were greater in women who scored more highly in assessments of emotional suppression before surgery. 23 This recalls Carl Rogers's idea that expressing emotion, far from reflecting more serious mental health concerns, may help to alleviate them.…”