1978
DOI: 10.1139/z78-318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ration digestion and retention times of digesta in domestic cattle (Bos taurus), American bison (Bison bison), and Tibetan yak (Bos grunniens)

Abstract: Digestive functions, digesta retention times, and plasma thyroid hormone concentrations were measured in three species of Bovidae: domestic cattle (Bos taurus; three breeds), American bison (Bison bison), and Tibetan yak (Bos grunniens), fed a pelleted ration (nitrogen, 2.62%) at a near maintenance level. Apparent digestibilities of dry matter, energy, and nitrogen components of the ration were not significantly different among animal groups except for one breed of cattle (Holstein–Friesian) which had higher d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the availability of natural feeds at high altitude is scarce, the animal has adapted itself to extract more nutrients from these feeds by increasing the retention time of feed in the gastro-intestinal tract. The average retention time of feed is about 72h, which is about 20% higher than that observed in domestic cattle (Schaffer et al, 1978).…”
Section: Ruminant Animalsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As the availability of natural feeds at high altitude is scarce, the animal has adapted itself to extract more nutrients from these feeds by increasing the retention time of feed in the gastro-intestinal tract. The average retention time of feed is about 72h, which is about 20% higher than that observed in domestic cattle (Schaffer et al, 1978).…”
Section: Ruminant Animalsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Direct comparisons of digestibility found differences (Peden et al 1974;Hawley et al 1981;Schwartz and Ellis 1981) as well as no differences (Schaefer et al 1978;Plumb and Dodd 1993) between bison and cattle (including Hereford and Scottish Highland breeds). Digestion retention time was also greater in bison than cattle (Schaefer et al 1978). Additionally, many ruminal fermentation characteristics do not differ between bison and Hereford steers; bison, however, do average greater ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentrations, greater ciliate protozoal counts, and greater cell volume than cattle (Towne et al 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…a) OMI and MRT; b) OMI and 903 OMC; c) MRT and aDOM; d) MRT and OMC. For statistics, see (Luginbuhl et al, 1990) Pudu puda 4 1 9.1 0.299 29.9 75.2 0.232 (Conklin-Brittain and Dierenfeld, 1996) Cephalophus maxwellii 4 1 9.4 0.305 42.2 73.0 0.341 (Conklin-Brittain and Dierenfeld, 1996) Capreolus capreolus 4 >1 24.7 0.405 27.0 67.7 0.302 (Holand, 1994) Capra hircus 4 1 29.7 0.777 45.9 51.3 1.117 Freudenberger and Hume, 1992;Kennedy et al, 1992) (Foot and Romberg, 1965;McIntosh, 1966;Forbes and Tribe, 1970;Dellow, 1982;Dellow and Hume, 1982;Luginbuhl et al, 1990;Kennedy et al, 1992;Pearson et al, 2006 Jiang and Hudson, 1996) (Schaefer et al, 1978;Colucci et al, 1982;Mathers et al, 1989;Luginbuhl et al, 1994;Burns et al, 1997;Whetsell et al, 2004;Pearson et al, 2006) (Cahill and McBride, 1995) GIT-Anatomy = gastrointestinal tract anatomy: 1 = caecum fermenter, 2 = colon fermenter, 3 = nonruminant foregut fermenter, 4 = ruminant foregut fermenter; BM = body mass; DMI = dry matter intake; MRT = mean retention time of particle markers (different markers) through the whole gastrointestinal tract; aD DM = apparent dry matter digestibility; DMC= mass of dry matter gastrointestinal tract content calculated according to Holleman and White (1989; for equations see the main text) Table 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%