Assessing the Jarman–Bell Principle: Scaling of intake, digestibility, retention time and gut fill with body mass in mammalian herbivores

Abstract

Differences in allometric scaling of physiological characters have the appeal to explain species diversification and niche differentiation along a body mass (BM) gradient -because they lead to different combinations of physiological properties, and thus may facilitate different adaptive strategies. An important argument in physiological ecology is built on the allometries of gut fill (assumed to scale to BM1.0) and energy requirements/intake (assumed to scale to BM0.75) in mammalian herbivores. From the difference in exponents, it has been postulated that the mean retention time (MRT) of digesta should scale to BM1.0-0.75 = BM0.25. This has been used to argue that larger animals have an advantage in digestive efficiency and hence can tolerate lower-quality diets. However, empirical data does not support the BM0.25 scaling of MRT, and the deduction of MRT scaling implies, according to physical principles, no scaling of digestibility; basing assumptions on digestive efficiency on the thus-derived MRT scaling amounts to circular reasoning. An alternative explanation considers a higher scaling exponent for food intake than for metabolism, allowing larger animals to eat more of a lower quality food without having to increase digestive efficiency; to date, this concept has only been explored in ruminants. Here, using data for 77 species in which intake, digestibility and MRT were measured (allowing the calculation of the dry matter gut contents DMC), we show that the unexpected shallow scaling of MRT is common in herbivores and may result from deviations of other scaling exponents from expectations. Notably, DMC have a lower scaling exponent than 1.0, and the 95% confidence intervals of the scaling exponents for intake and DMC generally overlap. Differences in the scaling of wet gut contents and dry matter gut contents confirm a previous finding that the dry matter concentration of gut contents decreases with body mass, possibly compensating for the less favourable volume-surface ratio in the guts of larger organisms. These findings suggest that traditional explanations for herbivore niche differentiation along a BM gradient should not be based on allometries of digestive physiology. In contrast, they support the recent interpretation that larger species can tolerate lower-quality diets because their intake has a higher allometric scaling than their basal metabolism, allowing them to eat relatively more of a lower quality food without having to increase digestive efficiency. MRT scaling amounts to circular reasoning. An alternative explanation considers a higher 38 scaling exponent for food intake than for metabolism, allowing larger animals to eat more of a 39 lower quality food without having to increase digestive efficiency; to date, this concept has 40 only been explored in ruminants. Here, using data for 77 species in which intake, digestibility 41 and MRT were measured (allowing the calculation of the dry matter gut contents DMC), we 42show that the unexpected shallow scaling of MRT is common in herbi...

Digesta retention patterns of solute and different-sized particles in camelids compared with ruminants and other foregut fermenters

“…The relative dry matter intake (rDMI) was calculated using an exponent of BM 0.85 , following Müller et al (2013). This approach was supported by the data obtained from the camelids investigated in this study, in which DMI scaled at BM 0.85 (95 %CI: 0.75;0.94) .…”

The digestive morphophysiology of wild, free-living, giraffes

“…Demment and van Soest (1985), van Soest (1996), Clauss et al (2003A;2009), and Muller et al (2013) have suggested that extraction of energy does not only depend on the size of the gastrointestinal tract. Efficient energy extraction also depends on digestibility and fermentation rate of browse, on reduction in particle size by rumination, a longer retention time of ingesta, and selection for diets of high quality, or optimal combinations of these.…”

Exceptional avian herbivores: multiple transitions toward herbivory in the bird order Anseriformes and its correlation with body mass

“…2007; Müller et al. 2013) have found little or no empirical support for the digestive efficiency hypothesis, indicating that such correlations are not due to any digestive advantage conferred by an increase in body mass.…”