2018
DOI: 10.18576/amisl/060304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio Estimators for Estimating Population Mean in Simple Random Sampling Using Auxiliary Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate numerically, two population data sets have been considered one with high and one with low correlation coefficient. The result obtained in table 2, revealed that the proposed estimators, 1 T , 2 T , Institute of Science, BHU Varanasi, India Subramani and Kumarapandiyan (2012), Abid et al (2016), Subzar et al (2017), Subzar et al (2018a), Subzar et al (2018b), Subzar et al (2018c), and Yadav and Zaman (2021). This indicates that the proposed estimators are more efficient and can produce better estimate of population mean than that of existing estimators including Yadav and Zaman (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To illustrate numerically, two population data sets have been considered one with high and one with low correlation coefficient. The result obtained in table 2, revealed that the proposed estimators, 1 T , 2 T , Institute of Science, BHU Varanasi, India Subramani and Kumarapandiyan (2012), Abid et al (2016), Subzar et al (2017), Subzar et al (2018a), Subzar et al (2018b), Subzar et al (2018c), and Yadav and Zaman (2021). This indicates that the proposed estimators are more efficient and can produce better estimate of population mean than that of existing estimators including Yadav and Zaman (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Difference-cum-ratio-type estimators were suggested by Kadilar and Cingi (2004) by using coefficient of variation and ____________________________ * Corresponding Author kurtosis of auxiliary variable X and modified by Kadilar and Cingi (2006) by adding correlation coefficient. Later on, extended subsequently by Subramani and Kumarapandiyan (2012), Abid et al (2016), Subzar et al (2017), Subzar et al (2018a), Subzar et al (2018b), Subzar et al (2018c) by using known parameters of auxiliary variable . Recently, Yadav and Zaman (2021) suggested some class of estimators by using conventional and nonconventional location parameters of auxiliary variable and sample size and found that their estimators were more efficient than the estimators developed by above mentioned authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, considering the theoretical comparisons in Section 4, and the findings of the numerical application and simulation, it is apparent that suggested estimators using some robust regression methods perform better than the competing estimators given by Kadilar and Cingi, 21 Subramani and Kumarapandiyan, 22,23 Abid et al 24 and Subzar et al 25 when there are outliers in data. The breakpoint of the LAD and M-estimations is 1∕n.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When condition (46) is satisfied, the suggested estimators given in (36)-(41) perform better than Subzar et al 25 estimators.…”
Section: Efficiency Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ozgul & Cingi [66] proposed a new class of exponential regression cum ratio estimator using functions of any known population parameters of the auxiliary variable, such as standard deviation, coefficient of variation, coefficient of skewness, coefficient of kurtosis and coefficient of correlation of the auxiliary variable for the estimation of finite population mean. Several authors like Kadilar and Cingi [67], Kadilar and Cingi [68], Subramani and Kumarapandiyan (2006), Abid et al [69], Subzar et al [70], Subzar et al [71], Subzar et al [72], Subzar et al [73] have proposed some regression-based estimators which utilized known functions of auxiliary variables. However, these auxiliary parameters are sensitive to outliers or extreme values that do present in the population distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%