2022
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.7273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust ratio‐type estimators for finite population mean in simple random sampling: A simulation study

Abstract: In this study, ratio estimators are proposed by utilizing some robust techniques to get the maximum benefit of the auxiliary variable for the estimation of the population mean in simple random sampling. The expressions for mean squared error are derived for the first degree of approximation. Theoretical comparisons demonstrate that the suggested estimators having robust regression estimates perform better than the existing estimators under certain conditions. Theoretical findings are supported with the aid of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…discussed ranked set sampling for the DF. The [ 31 , 32 ] discussed robust ratios to estimate the mean of a finite population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discussed ranked set sampling for the DF. The [ 31 , 32 ] discussed robust ratios to estimate the mean of a finite population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study more about robust regression see quantreg (Koenker, 2009) package in R-Software (2021), Bulut (2019, 2021), Zaman et al (2021Zaman et al ( , 2022, and Bulut and Zaman (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahzad et al 11 suggested quantile regression-ratio-type estimators for mean estimation under complete and partial auxiliary information. Zaman et al 12 discussed robust ratio‐type estimators for finite population mean in simple random sampling. Singh et al 13 discussed some efficient classes of estimators of population mean in two-phase successive sampling under random non response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%