Rating Of Agricultural Enterprises Of Irkutsk Region Based On Multivariate Analysis

Tyapkina, Maria

doi:10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.158

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, technologies for satellite positioning of agricultural machinery and equipment, systems for monitoring and control of the quality of works performed, systems for accounting and control of resources are in demand. Small agricultural businesses are consumers of digital services aimed at promoting and selling products [22][23].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization trends in the agricultural industry

Rasputina

2022

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a result of the digital transformation of agricultural enterprises, the economic and environmental efficiency of production and provision of services is increasing. Currently, Industry 4.0 technologies are changing the nature of agricultural enterprises, integrating intelligent technologies into the agricultural production. The purpose of the study is to analyze the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on agricultural enterprises. The digital transformation of the agricultural industry is a key tool for increasing efficiency in a rapidly changing market under growing competition and tightening requirements. Digitalization is not a new phenomenon for the industry; it is changing the existing architecture of interactions between the participants. The ongoing processes ensure the automation of routine and dangerous operations, the digitalization of physical and business processes, the end-to-end integration of all processes and more flexible management. At the same time, digital transformation has its own characteristics in each segment of the agricultural industry.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization trends in the agricultural industry

Rasputina

2022

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The grant funds were used to purchase agricultural equipment. The number of cattle in agricultural organizations has decreased due to the low profitability of milk and meat production and low return on investment as a result of a long production cycle [8]. Reducing government support for the livestock sector forces agricultural enterprises to change their production structure [9].…”

Section: Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structural changes in the agricultural sector

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article aims to describe structural changes in the agrarian sector of Irkutsk region caused by the government support for small businesses, simplified procedures for farm registering, accounting for property and production results, and taxation, which contributed to the development of peasant farming. The government support is required, but it can change the structure of areas and gross grain crops since peasant farms increase quantitative indicators rather than improve quality parameters (yield, productivity). This is especially true for the animal husbandry sector. With changes in government policies and decreasing government support, it will be difficult for individual farms to exist, since they lag behind collective farms in terms of maneuverability, financial capabilities, production and credit resources, which can cause new structural changes in a benefit for agricultural holdings. The government policy aimed at preserving the traditional way of life of the rural population should stimulate both the development of rural areas and agricultural production, and prevent the disintegration of collective farms that have competitive advantages

show abstract

“…The stage of organization development is evaluated through parameters of the coefficient of autonomy, profitability of sales, return on assets and market share of the organization based on multivariate analysis. The assessment methodology is described in the article (Tyapkina, 2018).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%