Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction

Singla, Litesh; Singla, Divya

doi:10.4103/ijds.ijds_94_17

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the periodontal distraction with cuts group, the results were in accordance with previous study [30] that performed periodontal distraction and completed canine retraction in 3 weeks. A similar ndings were obtained from another study [31] as it stated that complete rapid canine retraction can be done in 24.1 ± 2.08 days.…”

Section: Rate Of Canine Retractionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Assessment of Orthodontic Canine Retraction via Two Approaches of Periodontal Distraction: A Comparative Clinical Study

El-Hendawey

Hussein

Hssan

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to assess and compare two approaches of periodontal distraction during orthodontic canine retraction. Methods A consecutive sample of 27 patients (54 canines) requiring extraction of upper 4s and canine retraction were grouped into three groups; canine retraction by using buccal periodontal distractor with distal interseptal bone cuts (group I), canine retraction by using buccal periodontal distractor without distal interseptal bone cuts (group II), conventional canine retraction on miniscrew (group III). The patients were evaluated before (T0) and after canine retraction (T1) for rate of canine retraction directly in patient’s mouth and at 1st ,2nd ,4th and 7th days after activation for pain sensation through visual analog scale (VAS). Results Regarding the rate of canine retraction, statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant difference between 3 groups. A significantly higher value was recorded in group I, followed by group II, with the lowest value recorded in group III (P-value > 0.05). Regarding pain score, statistical analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between group I and II (p < 0.05) but the values recorded in them was significantly higher than group III within 1st and 2nd days (p > 0.05) respectively. Within 4th and 7th days, there was statically significant difference between 3 groups with the highest pain value in group II, followed by group I, with the lowest value in group III (p > 0.05). Conclusions canine retraction movement was accelerated effectively by periodontal distraction technique either with or without distal interseptal bone cuts; the periodontal distraction with distal interseptal bone cuts was higher in rate of canine retraction and lower in pain sensation than the periodontal distraction without distal interseptal bone cuts.

show abstract

Section: Rate Of Canine Retractionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Assessment of Orthodontic Canine Retraction via Two Approaches of Periodontal Distraction: A Comparative Clinical Study

El-Hendawey

Hussein

Hssan

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(28) One such mechanical manipulation is distraction of the periodontal ligament which was first applied by Liou and Huang in 1998 (29) to perform rapid canine retraction through distraction and named dental distraction which is similar to rapid palatal expansion of the mid-palatal suture after undermining and reduction of inter-septal bone thickness and depth distal to the canine (28) . Rapid canine distraction leads to faster retraction of incisors in both maxillary and mandibular arches that incisors are retracted immediately into the immature bone created after canine distraction, leading to significant reduction in treatment time (6 to 9 months), without damaging the periodontal ligament, nor affecting tooth vitality (29)(30) . In the present study canine distraction technique was compared with other surgical modalities used to accelerate maxillary canine retraction to asses' superiority of one technique over another.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%