2012
DOI: 10.17816/rfd2012335-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of Harmful and Hazardous Alcohol Consumption Estimatedby Latent Class Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the comparison Nevertheless, the provided comparison of the AUDIT-C scores and the resulting finding that approximately one-third of women and half of men who are current drinkers and patients of Russian PHC facilities drink at a level that poses potential risks to their health is in line with previous findings. For instance, previous studies using the full 10-item version of the AUDIT found that 76% of male and 47% of female dermatology patients and 55% of male and 45% of female general practice patients exceeded the non-sex-specific cut-off score of ≥8 for hazardous drinking, although these studies have been using slightly different translations and modifications of the tool (Plavinski et al, 2012a). The same research group found even higher proportions in male patients of dermatologists (57%) and general practitioners (80%) when using the same AUDIT version and the same cut-off score of ≥8 (Barinova et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the comparison Nevertheless, the provided comparison of the AUDIT-C scores and the resulting finding that approximately one-third of women and half of men who are current drinkers and patients of Russian PHC facilities drink at a level that poses potential risks to their health is in line with previous findings. For instance, previous studies using the full 10-item version of the AUDIT found that 76% of male and 47% of female dermatology patients and 55% of male and 45% of female general practice patients exceeded the non-sex-specific cut-off score of ≥8 for hazardous drinking, although these studies have been using slightly different translations and modifications of the tool (Plavinski et al, 2012a). The same research group found even higher proportions in male patients of dermatologists (57%) and general practitioners (80%) when using the same AUDIT version and the same cut-off score of ≥8 (Barinova et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%