2017
DOI: 10.1111/pace.13142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate disparity of near‐field versus far‐field ICD electrograms: A clue to the diagnosis of dissimilar ventricular rhythms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst dissimilar ventricular rhythms have been clinically observed and reported, there is no explanation for the underlying mechanism by which they occur. Intraventricular conduction block has been postulated as a possible mechanism (6, 8). The RV and LV have been shown to differ in their APD restitution response and ionic currents (9) and this may offer some explanation for the mechanism underlying dissimilar ventricular rhythms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst dissimilar ventricular rhythms have been clinically observed and reported, there is no explanation for the underlying mechanism by which they occur. Intraventricular conduction block has been postulated as a possible mechanism (6, 8). The RV and LV have been shown to differ in their APD restitution response and ionic currents (9) and this may offer some explanation for the mechanism underlying dissimilar ventricular rhythms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can only be a possible concept in CRT-D devices. It is unfortunately not applicable in the single- or dual-chamber ICDs because of the absence of LV sensing (3, 4). Further technical investigations in favor of a functioning hemodynamic sensor are possibly more promising as this would be applicable in all types of ICDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%