Background—
Conventional methods to assess local activation time (LAT) detect the peak of the bipolar electrogram (B-LAT
Peak
) or the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram (U-LAT
Slope
). We evaluated 3 novel methods to assess LAT: onset (B-LAT
Onset
) and center of mass (B-LAT
CoM
) of bipolar electrogram, and maximal negative slope of unipolar electrogram within a predefined bipolar window (U-LAT
Slope-hybrid
).
Methods and Results—
In 1753 atrial tachycardia and 1426 ventricular tachycardia recordings, the performance of the methods in detecting LAT was evaluated pair-wise (eg, B-LAT
Peak
versus B-LAT
Onset
). For each comparison, histogram analysis of the differences in LAT values was performed. Variation in differences (P95-P5) in low quality (LQ) was compared with high-quality electrograms. In a separate data set (12 atrial tachycardia and 10 ventricular tachycardia), we evaluated for each method the accuracy in algorithmic activation mapping. Both in atrial tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia, the variation in difference between the conventional and novel methods was larger in LQ electrograms. In contrast, variation in difference between the novel methods was comparable in LQ and high-quality electrograms. Except for LAT
Slope-hybrid
, all methods showed decreased mapping accuracy with increasing percentage of LQ electrograms. U-LAT
Slope-hybrid
accurately mapped activation in 16 out of 22 maps (versus B-LAT
CoM
, 14; B-LAT
Peak
, 14; B-LAT
Onset
, 13; U-LAT
Slope
, 4).
Conclusions—
In LQ atrial and ventricular electrograms, the novel LAT methods (B-LAT
Onset
, B-LAT
CoM
, and U-LAT
Slope-hybrid
) show less variation than the conventional methods. The U-LAT
Slope-hybrid
, a hybrid method that accurately detects the maximal negative unipolar slope, is associated with the highest accuracy in algorithmic mapping of atrial tachycardia/ventricular tachycardia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.