2021
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11020191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-Dependent Cohesive Models for Dynamic Mode I Interfacial Propagation and Failure of Unidirectional Composite Laminates

Abstract: With the increasing application of composite materials in anti-impact structure, the development of reliable rate-dependent interlaminar constitutive model becomes necessary. This study aims to assess and evaluate the applicability of three types of rate-dependent cohesive models (logarithmic, exponential and power) in numerical delamination simulation, through comparison with dynamic test results of double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens made from T700/MTM28-1 composite laminate. Crack propagation length hist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the capabilities of logarithmic, exponential, and power‐type rate‐dependent cohesive models in predicting crack propagation length, energy release rate, cohesive zone length, and reaction force are discussed and compared. [ 39 ] Waas et al [ 40 ] proposed a structural framework based on a smart mesh paradigm, an efficient modeling strategy, and a damage state transferring algorithm between LVI and CAI mesh to reduce computational time. Riccio et al [ 41 ] proposed a novel delamination growth simulation method to evaluate the effect of fiber bridging, which simulated the effect of fiber bridging on the debonding of skin‐stringer by changing the toughness of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the capabilities of logarithmic, exponential, and power‐type rate‐dependent cohesive models in predicting crack propagation length, energy release rate, cohesive zone length, and reaction force are discussed and compared. [ 39 ] Waas et al [ 40 ] proposed a structural framework based on a smart mesh paradigm, an efficient modeling strategy, and a damage state transferring algorithm between LVI and CAI mesh to reduce computational time. Riccio et al [ 41 ] proposed a novel delamination growth simulation method to evaluate the effect of fiber bridging, which simulated the effect of fiber bridging on the debonding of skin‐stringer by changing the toughness of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%