2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-016-9704-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rasiowa–Harrop Disjunction Property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being ∧ a "good" connective there is no obstacle in considering it as primitive in F at . On the contrary, recent studies in the canonical translation [5,4] show that the implementation of the η-conversions into atomic F or the validity of the Rasiowa-Harrop disjunction property in F at require conjunction to be primitive in the system. To help the comparison with the alternative translation of the previous sections which considers ∧ as primitive in F at we take the canonical translation with primitive conjunction in the target system.…”
Section: Lhsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Being ∧ a "good" connective there is no obstacle in considering it as primitive in F at . On the contrary, recent studies in the canonical translation [5,4] show that the implementation of the η-conversions into atomic F or the validity of the Rasiowa-Harrop disjunction property in F at require conjunction to be primitive in the system. To help the comparison with the alternative translation of the previous sections which considers ∧ as primitive in F at we take the canonical translation with primitive conjunction in the target system.…”
Section: Lhsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The canonical embedding is by now described in several publications but always in natural deduction style. See for instance [3,2] or [5,4]. In the former references conjunction is interpreted in F at by the Russell-Prawitz's translation of formulas while in the latter references conjunction is a primitive symbol of F at .…”
Section: Lhsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [2] it was shown that the calculus is expressive enough to embed full intuitionistic propositional logic (IPC). Recent research on F at (see [3,4,6,7]) has revealed some nice proof-theoretical properties of the system. The study in the present paper relies on the following three properties of F at : i) the strong normalization property, ii) the Church-Rosser property, and iii) the subformula property (for normal derivations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%