Rasch measurement analysis for validation instrument to evaluate students technical readiness for embedded systems

Ridwan, Intisar Ibrahim; Ali, Rosmah; Mohamed, Izzeldin Ibrahim; Adam, Mohamad Zulkefli; Elfadil, Nazar

doi:10.1109/tencon.2016.7848399

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Prior knowledge and skills have been found to have a substantial impact on the quality of learning and student accomplishment (Ridwan et al, 2016;Ibrahim et al, 2014); thus, students who are academically equipped in terms of prior knowledge and skills should be able to succeed in the embedded system design course. In recent years, various research studies have focused on prior knowledge and its impact on learning readiness and performance (Ridwan et al, 2016;Shuell, 2016;Dilnot et al, 2017;Rickels, 2017). The constructivist approach to learning, which has been prominent in recent decades, is intimately linked to interest in the influence of prior knowledge.…”

Section: Readiness For Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Embedded System Design Student’s Learning Readiness Instruments: Systematic Literature Review

Elfadil

Ibrahim

2022

Front. Educ.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate and measure the effects of student’s preparation before studying an embedded system design course, a systematic literature analysis was conducted, spanning publications from 1992 to 2020. Furthermore, evaluating such effects may help to close the gap between academically taught abilities and industry-required skills. The goal of the review was to gather and evaluate all reputable and effective studies that have looked into students’ learning preparation issues and solutions in embedded system design courses. Nonetheless, the purpose of this work was to extract and discuss the key features and methodologies from the selected research publications in order to present researchers and practitioners with a clear set of recommendations and solutions. The findings revealed that no instrument has been developed yet to assess students’ readiness to take up an embedded system design course. Furthermore, the majority of the instruments offered lacked concept clarity.

show abstract