2022
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.799683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded System Design Student’s Learning Readiness Instruments: Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: To evaluate and measure the effects of student’s preparation before studying an embedded system design course, a systematic literature analysis was conducted, spanning publications from 1992 to 2020. Furthermore, evaluating such effects may help to close the gap between academically taught abilities and industry-required skills. The goal of the review was to gather and evaluate all reputable and effective studies that have looked into students’ learning preparation issues and solutions in embedded system desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that students cannot understand a concept if their level of thinking has not reached the desired level. Elfadil & Ibrahim, (2022) divides learning readiness into three, namely cognitive readiness, affective readiness, and psychomotor readiness. Motivation is the willingness to focus, time, energy, and perseverance to learn (Kanat-Maymon et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that students cannot understand a concept if their level of thinking has not reached the desired level. Elfadil & Ibrahim, (2022) divides learning readiness into three, namely cognitive readiness, affective readiness, and psychomotor readiness. Motivation is the willingness to focus, time, energy, and perseverance to learn (Kanat-Maymon et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%