Rasch Calibration and Optimal Categorization of an Instrument Measuring Women's Exercise Perseverance and Barriers

Abstract

The purposes of this study were: (a) to determine the optimal categorization of an instrument measuring women's exercise perseverance and barriers using the Rasch analysis and (b) to examine urban women's exercise perseverance and barriers. A 23-item barrier instrument with five response categories was administered to 479 women from a metropolitan area. The data analysis started from collapsing the original five adjacent categories into three and four categories and 11 sets of original and collapsed data were analyzed using the Rasch rating scale model. The model-data fit, category and separation statistics, and parameter estimates provided by Rasch analyses were used to determine the optimal categorization of the instrument. Instead of the original five-category construct, which had a disordered internal construct, a collapsed three-category construct (i.e., Very Often/Often, Sometimes/Rarely, and Never) was found to have the optimal categorization. The time barrier domain was found to be the most severe barrier domain, but the barrier "lack of self-discipline" was the most severe individual barrier. Rasch calibration provides a new way to construct an instrument with optimal categorization, to describe the nature of barrier items and the respondents' attribute being measured, and to develop a practical and informative scoring sheet.

Assessing Science Motivation for College Students: Validation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II using the Rasch-Andrich Rating Scale Model

“…The ordinal scale does not have same distance between a score of 1 (Never) and 2 (Rarely), and a score of 2 (Rarely) and 3 (Sometimes); which is not allowed to sum score of all item responses. The logit scores are generated through consideration of each item difficulty and the transformation of ordinal scales to interval scales (You, 2016;Zhu, Timm, & Ainsworth, 2001). …”

Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Mental, Emotional, and Bodily Toughness Inventory

“…This option would consist of rewording the two items and administering it to additional subjects to see if this addresses the problem. One of the strengths of the Rasch analysis model used previously to psychometrically examine the MeBTough is that both the items and participants are placed on a common metric so that additional items could be included on the same metric at a later time (Zhu, Timm, & Ainsworth, 2001), which would allow for future DIF analyses of samples including more female athletes.…”

Development of the Mental, Emotional, and Bodily Toughness Inventory in Collegiate Athletes and Nonathletes

“…16 Some of these limitations are that the calibrations are sample dependent and item dependent and that the items and participants are placed on different scales. 17 Another common psychometric problem is the inability to critically examine the selected response categories.…”