2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid temporal recalibration occurs crossmodally without stimulus specificity but is absent unimodally

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In cross-modal research (Alais, Newell, & Mamassian, 2010), previous studies using the intertrial adaptation paradigm with audiovisual stimuli have shown the aftereffects are comparable in magnitude to those obtained with prolonged exposure paradigms (Harvey et al, 2014;Van der Burg et al, 2013Wozny & Shams, 2011) and that the effects are even present and strong when participants passively perceive the audiovisual stimuli (Van der . Although an early report suggested that the magnitude plateaus after 12-20 s of adaptation (Kay & Matthews, 1972), two subsequent studies investigating the time-course of the aftereffect concluded that the aftereffect accrues rapidly in the first few minutes but does not saturate until 20-30 minutes (Regan & Tansley, 1979;Tansley & Suffield, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cross-modal research (Alais, Newell, & Mamassian, 2010), previous studies using the intertrial adaptation paradigm with audiovisual stimuli have shown the aftereffects are comparable in magnitude to those obtained with prolonged exposure paradigms (Harvey et al, 2014;Van der Burg et al, 2013Wozny & Shams, 2011) and that the effects are even present and strong when participants passively perceive the audiovisual stimuli (Van der . Although an early report suggested that the magnitude plateaus after 12-20 s of adaptation (Kay & Matthews, 1972), two subsequent studies investigating the time-course of the aftereffect concluded that the aftereffect accrues rapidly in the first few minutes but does not saturate until 20-30 minutes (Regan & Tansley, 1979;Tansley & Suffield, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This improves efficiency as no time is lost in timeconsuming adaptation periods and every trial provides data. Moreover, as recent multisensory studies of intertrial adaptation have shown in both the spatial (Wozny & Shams, 2011) and temporal (Harvey, Van der Burg, & Alais, 2014; Van der Burg et al, 2013;Van der Burg, Orchard-Mills, & Alais, 2014) domains, adaptation effects are evident after a single brief trial. This challenges the assumption in traditional adaptation studies that prolonged exposure to an adaptor is necessary to produce reliable perceptual aftereffects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The amplitude was free to vary between 0 and 1. The mean of the Gaussian was taken as the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS), and the SD was taken as a measure of the TWS [4749, 52]. The shape of the normal distribution proved to accurately describe the reports of synchrony (mean R 2 = 0.911), and we were not able to find a significant difference in the Goodness-of-Fit across different ages (independent samples over sliding bins of 11 participants–see below–all p values > 0.12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, Van der Burg, Alais and Cass (2013) [47] found clear evidence that when participants performed a simultaneity judgment task, the PSS was contingent upon the modality order (i.e., visual first, auditory first) of the preceding trial. This rapid recalibration effect can be observed using simple audiovisual stimuli such as a flash in combination with a beep [4749], but also for perceptually complex stimuli such as audiovisual speech [50]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal recalibration has been found to generalize across different artificial stimuli, whether induced by prolonged [18,25] or brief [32] exposures. By contrast, Roseboom & Arnold [21] found that for audiovisual speech stimuli, participants concurrently maintained two different recalibrations-one with a positive shift in PSS, the other with a negative shift-when each was associated with a different actor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%