1985
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.694-697.1985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid subtyping of equine herpesvirus 1 with monoclonal antibodies

Abstract: Two antigenically similar subtypes of equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) cause disease in horses. A procedure for rapid differentiation of the two EHV-1 subtypes with monoclonal antibodies was developed. Subtype-specific pools of monoclonal antibodies were constructed, characterized, and used in enzyme immunofiltration and indirect immunofluorescence assays to subtype 50 epizootiologically unrelated field isolates of EHV-1. Both assays allowed accurate subtype identification of each EHV-1 isolate with the monoclonal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical signs of EHV-1 infection in young horses consist of fever, serous to mucopurulent nasal discharge, occasional coughing and local lymphomegaly (Doll et al 1954;Bryans 1964Bryans , 1980Coggins 1979), whereas infections in older horses are often mild or subclinical (Bryans 1980(Bryans , 1981. EHV-I infection cannot be distinguished from EHV-4 infection clinically in the field but monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can differentiate between these viruses (Yeargan et al 1985;Sinclair et al 1989). Acute EHV-I infections or reactivations of latent infection recur throughout life and may result in a cell associated viraemia and abortion in pregnant mares (Allen and Bryans 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical signs of EHV-1 infection in young horses consist of fever, serous to mucopurulent nasal discharge, occasional coughing and local lymphomegaly (Doll et al 1954;Bryans 1964Bryans , 1980Coggins 1979), whereas infections in older horses are often mild or subclinical (Bryans 1980(Bryans , 1981. EHV-I infection cannot be distinguished from EHV-4 infection clinically in the field but monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can differentiate between these viruses (Yeargan et al 1985;Sinclair et al 1989). Acute EHV-I infections or reactivations of latent infection recur throughout life and may result in a cell associated viraemia and abortion in pregnant mares (Allen and Bryans 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the virus is present, CPE is visible within 24-48 h post injection at which time infected cells are harvested and PCR on electron microscopy (EM) used to identify the virus as a herpesvirus. To determine the identity of the virus either PCR (Kirisawa et al 1993), ELISA (Yeargan et al 1985) or DNA fingerprint (Studdert 1983) can be used.…”
Section: Equine Herpesvirus-1 and -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For virus isolation, suspensions (10% w/v) of tissue obtained from the aborted fetuses were inoculated onto monolayers of equine fetal kidney cells and the RK-13 cell line. Virus isolates were identified by indirect immunofluorescence, using monoclonal antibodies specific for EHV-1 or -4 (Yeargan et al 1985). Serum antibody titres to EHV-1 were determined by a virus neutralisation test, as described previously by Thomson et al (1976).…”
Section: Laboratory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%