2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid retreat of a Scandinavian marine outlet glacier in response to warming at the last glacial termination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2016, 2019; Åkesson et al . 2020). An ice‐sheet sector less sensitive to climate changes may have facilitated the prolonged and stable maximum YD ice‐sheet position inferred for Mid‐Norway in this study, including the delayed initial demise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016, 2019; Åkesson et al . 2020). An ice‐sheet sector less sensitive to climate changes may have facilitated the prolonged and stable maximum YD ice‐sheet position inferred for Mid‐Norway in this study, including the delayed initial demise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setup represents a medium-sized fjord-glacier system, which has similar dimensions and dynamics as, for example, the present-day Alison glacier in NW Greenland, where the fjord width is about 5 km, water depth is around 500 m, and observed ice discharge has increased from ∼ 4 to ∼ 8 Gt yr −1 in the past 20 yr (Mouginot et al, 2019). It is furthermore broadly representative of outlet glaciers from the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet during the last glacial, such as the Hardangerfjorden glacier (Mangerud et al, 2013;Åkesson et al, 2020).…”
Section: Reference Glaciermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While remotely sensed observations of ice dynamics over the past decades exist, the recent retreat in Greenland and elsewhere over this period is too short to allow for a complete assessment of geometry-glacier interactions (Carr et al, 2013;Catania et al, 2018;Bunce et al, 2018). In contrast, on paleo-timescales, retreat has occurred over large distances, but the temporal resolution of geomorphological studies is limited by the available geological data, and key information is missing to discern different drivers of glacier retreat (Briner et al, 2009;Åkesson et al, 2020). Meanwhile, numerical studies that can address these issues have so far mostly used width-and depth-integrated flow line models, which carry many assumptions that do not hold in some settings (Nick et al, 2009;Åkesson et al, 2018b;Steiger et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setup represents a medium sized fjord-glacier system, which has similar dimensions and dynamics as, for example, the present-day Alison glacier in NW Greenland, where the fjord width is about 5 km, water depth is around 500 m and observed ice discharge has increased from ∼ 4 to ∼ 8 Gt yr −1 in the past 20 yrs (Mouginot et al, 2019). It is furthermore broadly representative of outlet glaciers from the Fennoscandian ice sheet during the last glacial, such as the Hardangerfjorden glacier (Mangerud et al, 2013;Åkesson et al, 2020).…”
Section: Reference Glaciermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ice dynamics over the past decades exist, the recent retreat in Greenland and elsewhere over this period is too short to allow for a complete assessment of geometry-glacier interactions (Carr et al, 2013;Catania et al, 2018;Bunce et al, 2018). In contrast, on paleo-time scales, retreat has occurred over large distances, but the temporal resolution of geomorphological studies is limited by the available geological data and key information is missing to discern different drivers of glacier retreat (Briner et al, 2009;Åkesson et al, 2020). Meanwhile, numerical studies that can address these issues have so far mostly used widthand depth-integrated flowline models, which carry many assumptions that do not hold in some settings (Nick et al, 2009;Åkesson et al, 2018b;Steiger et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%